ADNPActivity-dependent neuroprotector homeobox
Autism Reports / Total Reports
43 / 88Rare Variants / Common Variants
190 / 0Aliases
ADNP, ADNP1Associated Syndromes
Helsmoortel-Van der Aa syndrome, ASD, ID, Helsmoortel-van der Aa syndrome, Helsmoortel-Van der Aa syndrome, DD, ID, Helsmoortel-van der Aa syndrome, DD, Helsmoortel-van der Aa syndrome, ASD, DD, Helsmoortel-van der Aa syndrome, ASD, DD, ID, Helsmoortel-van der Aa syndrome, ASD, DD, epilepsyChromosome Band
20q13.13Associated Disorders
DD/NDD, ADHD, ID, EPS, ASDGenetic Category
Rare Single Gene Mutation, Syndromic, FunctionalRelevance to Autism
Recurrent mutations in the ADNP gene have been identified in multiple individuals with ASD as described below. Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases in two reports by O'Roak and colleagues in 2012 (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; the probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP was given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report (PMID 24531329). Furthermore, the frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led Helsmoortel and colleagues to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome. Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) in De Rubeis et al., 2014 identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A two-stage analysis of rare de novo and inherited coding variants in 42,607 ASD cases, including 35,130 new cases from the SPARK cohort, in Zhou et al., 2022 identified ADNP as a gene reaching exome-wide significance (P < 2.5E-06).
Molecular Function
Potential transcription factor that may mediate some of the neuroprotective peptide VIP-associated effects involving normal growth and cancer proliferation. In brain, expression is stronger in the cerebellum and cortex regions.
External Links
SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to ADNP (88 Reports)
# | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Primary | Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations | O'Roak BJ , et al. (2012) | Yes | - |
2 | Support | Multiplex targeted sequencing identifies recurrently mutated genes in autism spectrum disorders | O'Roak BJ , et al. (2012) | Yes | - |
3 | Recent Recommendation | A SWI/SNF-related autism syndrome caused by de novo mutations in ADNP | Helsmoortel C , et al. (2014) | No | ASD, DD, ID, epilepsy |
4 | Support | Expansion of the clinical phenotype associated with mutations in activity-dependent neuroprotective protein | Pescosolido MF et al. (2014) | No | DD, ADHD |
5 | Support | Challenges and opportunities in the investigation of unexplained intellectual disability using family-based whole-exome sequencing | Helsmoortel C et al. (2015) | No | ASD, DD, ID |
6 | Recent Recommendation | The transcriptional regulator ADNP links the BAF (SWI/SNF) complexes with autism | Vandeweyer G , et al. (2014) | Yes | ID |
7 | Recent Recommendation | The NAP motif of activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) regulates dendritic spines through microtubule end binding proteins | Oz S , et al. (2014) | No | - |
8 | Recent Recommendation | Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
9 | Support | Recurrent de novo mutations implicate novel genes underlying simplex autism risk | O'Roak BJ , et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
10 | Support | Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders | Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study (2014) | Yes | - |
11 | Recent Recommendation | Activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) exhibits striking sexual dichotomy impacting on autistic and Alzheimer's pathologies | Malishkevich A , et al. (2015) | No | - |
12 | Support | The Compassionate Side of Neuroscience: Tony Sermone's Undiagnosed Genetic Journey--ADNP Mutation | Gozes I , et al. (2015) | Yes | - |
13 | Recent Recommendation | Low load for disruptive mutations in autism genes and their biased transmission | Iossifov I , et al. (2015) | Yes | - |
14 | Support | Insights into Autism Spectrum Disorder Genomic Architecture and Biology from 71 Risk Loci | Sanders SJ , et al. (2015) | Yes | - |
15 | Support | Targeted DNA Sequencing from Autism Spectrum Disorder Brains Implicates Multiple Genetic Mechanisms | D'Gama AM , et al. (2015) | Yes | - |
16 | Support | Comprehensive molecular testing in patients with high functioning autism spectrum disorder | Alvarez-Mora MI , et al. (2016) | Yes | - |
17 | Support | Additional data on the clinical phenotype of Helsmoortel-Van der Aa syndrome associated with a novel truncating mutation in ADNP gene | Krajewska-Walasek M , et al. (2016) | No | ASD, DD, ID |
18 | Support | Meta-analysis of 2,104 trios provides support for 10 new genes for intellectual disability | Lelieveld SH et al. (2016) | No | - |
19 | Support | Genome-wide characteristics of de novo mutations in autism | Yuen RK et al. (2016) | Yes | - |
20 | Support | De novo genic mutations among a Chinese autism spectrum disorder cohort | Wang T , et al. (2016) | Yes | - |
21 | Support | Clinical exome sequencing: results from 2819 samples reflecting 1000 families | Trujillano D , et al. (2016) | No | - |
22 | Support | Targeted sequencing identifies 91 neurodevelopmental-disorder risk genes with autism and developmental-disability biases | Stessman HA , et al. (2017) | Yes | - |
23 | Support | Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder | C Yuen RK et al. (2017) | Yes | - |
24 | Support | Further evidence that a blepharophimosis syndrome phenotype is associated with a specific class of mutation in the ADNP gene | Takenouchi T , et al. (2017) | No | - |
25 | Support | Novel features of Helsmoortel-Van der Aa/ADNP syndrome in a boy with a known pathogenic mutation in the ADNP gene detected by exome sequencing | Li C et al. (2017) | No | DD |
26 | Support | The Eight and a Half Year Journey of Undiagnosed AD: Gene Sequencing and Funding of Advanced Genetic Testing Has Led to Hope and New Beginnings | Gozes I et al. (2017) | No | ASD, DD, ID |
27 | Support | Using medical exome sequencing to identify the causes of neurodevelopmental disorders: Experience of 2 clinical units and 216 patients | Chrot E , et al. (2017) | No | - |
28 | Support | Diagnostic exome sequencing of syndromic epilepsy patients in clinical practice | Tumien B , et al. (2017) | No | Stereotypic behavior, aggressive behavior |
29 | Support | Mutation in the ADNP gene associated with Noonan syndrome features | Alkhunaizi E et al. (2018) | No | ASD, DD, ID |
30 | Support | Helsmoortel-Van der Aa Syndrome as emerging clinical diagnosis in intellectually disabled children with autistic traits and ocular involvement | Pascolini G , et al. (2018) | No | Autistic behavior |
31 | Recent Recommendation | Clinical Presentation of a Complex Neurodevelopmental Disorder Caused by Mutations in ADNP | Van Dijck A , et al. (2018) | No | ASD or autistic features |
32 | Support | Longitudinal ophthalmic findings in a child with Helsmoortel-Van der Aa Syndrome | Gale MJ , et al. (2018) | No | DD, ID |
33 | Support | A heterozygous microdeletion of 20q13.13 encompassing ADNP gene in a child with Helsmoortel-van der Aa syndrome | Huynh MT , et al. (2018) | No | ID, autistic features |
34 | Support | The autism spectrum phenotype in ADNP syndrome | Arnett AB , et al. (2018) | No | ASD |
35 | Support | Genome sequencing identifies multiple deleterious variants in autism patients with more severe phenotypes | Guo H , et al. (2018) | Yes | - |
36 | Support | Genetic Diagnostic Evaluation of Trio-Based Whole Exome Sequencing Among Children With Diagnosed or Suspected Autism Spectrum Disorder | Du X , et al. (2018) | Yes | DD/ID |
37 | Support | Inherited and multiple de novo mutations in autism/developmental delay risk genes suggest a multifactorial model | Guo H , et al. (2018) | Yes | - |
38 | Support | Both rare and common genetic variants contribute to autism in the Faroe Islands | Leblond CS , et al. (2019) | Yes | - |
39 | Support | Cellular and animal models of skin alterations in the autism-related ADNP syndrome | Mollinedo P et al. (2019) | No | ASD, ID |
40 | Support | Gene domain-specific DNA methylation episignatures highlight distinct molecular entities of ADNP syndrome | Bend EG , et al. (2019) | No | - |
41 | Support | Whole genome sequencing and variant discovery in the ASPIRE autism spectrum disorder cohort | Callaghan DB , et al. (2019) | Yes | - |
42 | Support | Developmental Phenotype of the Rare Case of DJ Caused by a Unique ADNP Gene De Novo Mutation | Levine J , et al. (2019) | Yes | ADHD, behavioral problems |
43 | Support | Lessons Learned from Large-Scale, First-Tier Clinical Exome Sequencing in a Highly Consanguineous Population | Monies D , et al. (2019) | Yes | - |
44 | Support | Impact of on-site clinical genetics consultations on diagnostic rate in children and young adults with autism spectrum disorder | Munnich A , et al. (2019) | Yes | - |
45 | Support | Exome sequencing of 457 autism families recruited online provides evidence for autism risk genes | Feliciano P et al. (2019) | Yes | - |
46 | Recent Recommendation | Discovery of autism/intellectual disability somatic mutations in Alzheimer's brains: mutated ADNP cytoskeletal impairments and repair as a case study | Ivashko-Pachima Y , et al. (2019) | No | - |
47 | Support | Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | Yes | - |
48 | Support | Early behavioral and developmental interventions in ADNP-syndrome: A case report of SWI/SNF-related neurodevelopmental syndrome | Shillington A et al. (2020) | No | ASD |
49 | Support | ADNP Controls Gene Expression Through Local Chromatin Architecture by Association With BRG1 and CHD4 | Sun X et al. (2020) | No | - |
50 | Support | Large-scale targeted sequencing identifies risk genes for neurodevelopmental disorders | Wang T et al. (2020) | Yes | DD, ID |
51 | Support | - | Ohashi K et al. (2021) | Yes | - |
52 | Support | - | Abe-Hatano C et al. (2021) | Yes | - |
53 | Support | - | Valentino F et al. (2021) | No | Epilepsy/seizures |
54 | Support | - | Mahjani B et al. (2021) | Yes | - |
55 | Support | - | Karmon G et al. (2021) | No | - |
56 | Support | - | ÃÂlvarez-Mora MI et al. (2022) | No | - |
57 | Support | - | Brea-Fernández AJ et al. (2022) | No | Epilepsy/seizures |
58 | Support | - | Ivashko-Pachima Y et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
59 | Support | - | Chuan Z et al. (2022) | No | - |
60 | Support | - | Conrow-Graham M et al. (2022) | No | - |
61 | Support | - | Krgovic D et al. (2022) | Yes | ADHD, DD, ID |
62 | Support | - | Levchenko O et al. (2022) | No | - |
63 | Support | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | ADHD, SCZ, epilepsy/seizures |
64 | Support | - | Ganaiem M et al. (2022) | No | Alzheimer's disease |
65 | Support | - | Shimelis H et al. (2023) | Yes | - |
66 | Support | - | Szab TM et al. (2022) | No | Autistic features, stereotypy |
67 | Support | - | Bennison SA et al. (2023) | No | - |
68 | Support | - | Gozes I et al. (2023) | No | - |
69 | Support | - | Georget M et al. (2023) | No | Autistic features |
70 | Recent Recommendation | - | Kundishora AJ et al. (2023) | No | ASD, DD, epilepsy/seizures |
71 | Support | - | Spataro N et al. (2023) | No | ASD |
72 | Support | - | Zhang Y et al. (2023) | Yes | ID |
73 | Support | - | Chen LJ et al. (2023) | No | - |
74 | Recent Recommendation | - | Timberlake AT et al. (2023) | No | ASD |
75 | Support | - | Cho H et al. (2023) | No | - |
76 | Support | - | Bartolomaeus T et al. (2023) | No | - |
77 | Support | - | Cirnigliaro M et al. (2023) | Yes | - |
78 | Support | - | Karthika Ajit Valaparambil et al. () | Yes | - |
79 | Support | - | Giulia Pascolini et al. (2024) | Yes | Stereotypy |
80 | Support | - | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | No | ASD, DD, ID |
81 | Support | - | Claudio Peter D'Incal et al. (2024) | Yes | - |
82 | Support | - | Tamam Khalaf et al. (2024) | No | ASD |
83 | Support | - | Yasser Al-Sarraj et al. (2024) | Yes | - |
84 | Support | - | Lei Wan et al. (2024) | Yes | - |
85 | Support | - | Emily Neuhaus et al. (2024) | Yes | Oppositional features |
86 | Support | - | Claudio D'Incal et al. (2024) | Yes | - |
87 | Support | - | Ruohao Wu et al. (2024) | Yes | - |
88 | Support | - | Camilla Sarli et al. () | No | - |
Rare Variants (190)
Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
- | - | copy_number_loss | De novo | - | Simplex | 29899371 | Huynh MT , et al. (2018) | |
c.893T>G | p.Leu298Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.484C>T | p.Gln162Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1102C>T | p.Gln368Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1930C>T | p.Arg644Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2157C>A | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2157C>A | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2157C>G | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2157C>G | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2188C>T | p.Arg730Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2382G>A | p.Trp794Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1102C>T | p.Gln368Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2157C>A | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2157C>G | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2188C>T | p.Arg730Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.632T>A | p.Leu211Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 27824329 | Wang T , et al. (2016) | |
c.568C>T | p.Gln190Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 37063667 | Chen LJ et al. (2023) | |
c.2157C>G | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 28579975 | Gozes I et al. (2017) | |
c.2213C>A | p.Ser738Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 36553633 | Szab TM et al. (2022) | |
c.2156dup | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 37035742 | Zhang Y et al. (2023) | |
c.517C>T | p.Arg173Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 28708303 | Chrot E , et al. (2017) | |
c.2157C>G | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 29780943 | Gale MJ , et al. (2018) | |
c.110A>T | p.Asp37Val | missense_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.253T>C | p.Phe85Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2188C>T | p.Arg730Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 29286531 | Tumien B , et al. (2017) | |
c.2188C>T | p.Arg730Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 35813072 | Krgovic D et al. (2022) | |
c.715C>G | p.His239Asp | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2712dup | p.Asn905Ter | stop_gained | Familial | - | - | 36980980 | Spataro N et al. (2023) | |
c.1102C>T | p.Gln368Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 30107084 | Arnett AB , et al. (2018) | |
c.2157C>A | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 30107084 | Arnett AB , et al. (2018) | |
c.673C>T | p.Arg225Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.1535T>G | p.Leu512Arg | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1540T>G | p.Cys514Gly | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1568A>C | p.Asp523Ala | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1931G>A | p.Arg644Gln | missense_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1594C>T | p.Arg532Trp | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2157C>A | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.2157C>A | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.673C>T | p.Arg225Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 28191889 | Stessman HA , et al. (2017) | |
c.1084C>G | p.Gln362Glu | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 36669790 | Gozes I et al. (2023) | |
c.2188C>T | p.Arg730Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 27479843 | Lelieveld SH et al. (2016) | |
c.2213C>G | p.Ser738Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 28191889 | Stessman HA , et al. (2017) | |
c.1360G>T | p.Glu454Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 38438125 | Tamam Khalaf et al. (2024) | |
c.2156dup | p.Tyr719Ter | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1917T>C | p.Leu639%3D | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.3281G>A | p.Gly1094Glu | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35571021 | Chuan Z et al. (2022) | |
c.2157C>G | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 28407407 | Takenouchi T , et al. (2017) | |
c.1211C>A | p.Ser404Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 24531329 | Helsmoortel C , et al. (2014) | |
c.1930C>T | p.Arg644Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | - | 24531329 | Helsmoortel C , et al. (2014) | |
c.2157C>G | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 24531329 | Helsmoortel C , et al. (2014) | |
c.2156dup | p.Tyr719Ter | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 28708303 | Chrot E , et al. (2017) | |
- | - | copy_number_loss | Unknown | Not maternal | Simplex | 30675382 | Leblond CS , et al. (2019) | |
c.673C>T | p.Arg225Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 38204290 | Giulia Pascolini et al. (2024) | |
c.-89-3923_201+2793inv | - | inversion | De novo | - | Simplex | 36828924 | Georget M et al. (2023) | |
c.517C>T | p.Arg173Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 31406558 | Munnich A , et al. (2019) | |
c.2157C>G | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 38204290 | Giulia Pascolini et al. (2024) | |
c.2157del | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 38204290 | Giulia Pascolini et al. (2024) | |
c.2188C>T | p.Arg730Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 38204290 | Giulia Pascolini et al. (2024) | |
c.2T>C | p.Met1? | initiator_codon_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 30555518 | Du X , et al. (2018) | |
c.334_335insA | p.Cys112Ter | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.3170T>A | p.Leu1057Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 28263302 | C Yuen RK et al. (2017) | |
c.790C>T | p.Arg264Ter | stop_gained | Unknown | - | Unknown | 35887114 | Levchenko O et al. (2022) | |
c.190dup | p.Thr64AsnfsTer35 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.287del | p.Val96AlafsTer65 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2156dup | p.Tyr719Ter | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 30679581 | Mollinedo P et al. (2019) | |
c.2157C>G | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.2188C>T | p.Arg730Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.118C>T | p.Gln40Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 25169753 | Vandeweyer G , et al. (2014) | |
c.339del | p.Phe114SerfsTer47 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.819del | p.Lys274AsnfsTer31 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1713dup | p.Arg572GlufsTer6 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2231del | p.Glu744GlyfsTer9 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2287del | p.Ser763ProfsTer9 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.103dup | p.Ile35AsnfsTer5 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 31029150 | Bend EG , et al. (2019) | |
c.10C>G | p.Leu4Val | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | Unknown | 31130284 | Monies D , et al. (2019) | |
c.2157C>G | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 29475819 | Pascolini G , et al. (2018) | |
c.2188C>T | p.Arg730Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 29475819 | Pascolini G , et al. (2018) | |
c.1287dup | p.Ala430CysfsTer10 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2318dup | p.Tyr774ValfsTer14 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.3047dup | p.Ala1017GlyfsTer6 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1049dup | p.Leu351SerfsTer48 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2457del | p.Lys819AsnfsTer10 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.3047dup | p.Ala1017GlyfsTer6 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.3170T>A | p.Leu1057Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 28191889 | Stessman HA , et al. (2017) | |
c.2157C>A | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 35322241 | Brea-Fernández AJ et al. (2022) | |
c.2188C>T | p.Arg730Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 35322241 | Brea-Fernández AJ et al. (2022) | |
c.2288C>T | p.Ser763Phe | missense_variant | Familial | Maternal | - | 27824329 | Wang T , et al. (2016) | |
c.1035_1038del | p.Ser346Ter | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 28263302 | C Yuen RK et al. (2017) | |
c.498_499del | p.Tyr166Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.2808del | p.Tyr936Ter | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 24531329 | Helsmoortel C , et al. (2014) | |
c.2157C>G | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 25057125 | Pescosolido MF et al. (2014) | |
c.2261T>G | p.Leu754Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.1327A>G | p.Thr443Ala | missense_variant | Unknown | - | - | 26845707 | Alvarez-Mora MI , et al. (2016) | |
c.361_362del | p.Leu121GlyfsTer5 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2126C>T | p.Ser709Phe | missense_variant | Familial | Maternal | - | 33590427 | Ohashi K et al. (2021) | |
c.2772G>C | p.Glu924Asp | missense_variant | Familial | Paternal | - | 33590427 | Ohashi K et al. (2021) | |
c.190dup | p.Thr64AsnfsTer35 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 30107084 | Arnett AB , et al. (2018) | |
c.287del | p.Val96AlafsTer65 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 30107084 | Arnett AB , et al. (2018) | |
c.3170T>A | p.Leu1057Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.2491_2494del | p.Leu831IlefsTer82 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 28475273 | Li C et al. (2017) | |
c.539_542del | p.Val180GlyfsTer17 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.853_857del | p.Pro285AspfsTer27 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.3127G>T | p.Asp1043Tyr | missense_variant | Familial | Maternal | - | 33590427 | Ohashi K et al. (2021) | |
c.339del | p.Phe114SerfsTer47 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 30107084 | Arnett AB , et al. (2018) | |
c.819del | p.Lys274AsnfsTer31 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 30107084 | Arnett AB , et al. (2018) | |
c.2287del | p.Ser763ProfsTer9 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 30107084 | Arnett AB , et al. (2018) | |
c.3281G>T | p.Gly1094Val | missense_variant | Unknown | - | Unknown | 26637798 | D'Gama AM , et al. (2015) | |
c.2059T>C | p.Cys687Arg | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.2188C>G | p.Arg730Gly | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.2157C>A | p.Tyr719Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 38572415 | Yasser Al-Sarraj et al. (2024) | |
c.1402_1403del | p.Glu468ThrfsTer2 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2421_2422del | p.Arg808GlufsTer6 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2825_2828del | p.Thr942ArgfsTer6 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.539_542del | p.Val180GlyfsTer17 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 36553633 | Szab TM et al. (2022) | |
c.2289del | p.Tyr764MetfsTer8 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.1553G>A | p.Arg518His | missense_variant | Unknown | - | Unknown | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | |
c.1668G>C | p.Gln556His | missense_variant | Unknown | - | Unknown | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | |
c.2881G>T | p.Asp961Tyr | missense_variant | Unknown | - | Unknown | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | |
c.1046_1047del | p.Leu349ArgfsTer49 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1046_1047del | p.Leu349ArgfsTer49 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2194_2197del | p.Leu732MetfsTer20 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2491_2494del | p.Leu831IlefsTer82 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.2496_2499del | p.Asn832LysfsTer81 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1004_1005del | p.Lys335IlefsTer63 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1239_1240del | p.Gln414ValfsTer25 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.3069_3072del | p.Arg1023SerfsTer3 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.3136_3137del | p.Gln1046ValfsTer6 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2314dup | p.Thr772AsnfsTer16 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 34356170 | Valentino F et al. (2021) | |
c.746A>G | p.Tyr249Cys | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.1792C>T | p.Gln598Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 35183220 | ÃÂlvarez-Mora MI et al. (2022) | |
c.1035_1038del | p.Ser346Ter | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 27525107 | Yuen RK et al. (2016) | |
c.311A>G | p.Lys104Arg | missense_variant | Unknown | - | - | 37943464 | Karthika Ajit Valaparambil et al. () | |
c.-5-1_-4del | - | splice_site_variant | De novo | - | - | 38424297 | Claudio Peter D'Incal et al. (2024) | |
c.539_542del | p.Val180GlyfsTer17 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 36475376 | Shimelis H et al. (2023) | |
c.294_295del | p.Ser98ArgfsTer4 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 38438125 | Tamam Khalaf et al. (2024) | |
c.2157del | p.Tyr719Ter | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 27848944 | Trujillano D , et al. (2016) | |
c.2188C>T | p.Arg730Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 27031564 | Krajewska-Walasek M , et al. (2016) | |
c.2317_2318del | p.Lys773ValfsTer14 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 34615535 | Mahjani B et al. (2021) | |
c.2496_2499del | p.Asn832LysfsTer81 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 35813072 | Krgovic D et al. (2022) | |
c.3071_3072del | p.Glu1024AlafsTer7 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | - | 35813072 | Krgovic D et al. (2022) | |
c.2194_2197del | p.Leu732MetfsTer20 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 36980980 | Spataro N et al. (2023) | |
c.2491_2494del | p.Leu831IlefsTer82 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 36980980 | Spataro N et al. (2023) | |
c.537dup | p.Val180SerfsTer2 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 31127536 | Levine J , et al. (2019) | |
c.64dup | p.Ile22AsnfsTer3 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.3047dup | p.Ala1017GlyfsTer6 | frameshift_variant | Familial | Maternal | - | 33004838 | Wang T et al. (2020) | |
c.1046_1047del | p.Leu349ArgfsTer49 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 30107084 | Arnett AB , et al. (2018) | |
c.2250_2274del | p.Val751MetfsTer13 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 30107084 | Arnett AB , et al. (2018) | |
c.2496_2499del | p.Asn832LysfsTer81 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 30107084 | Arnett AB , et al. (2018) | |
c.2355_2356del | p.Glu785AspfsTer2 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.651_655del | p.Glu218Ter | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 29424797 | Alkhunaizi E et al. (2018) | |
c.319del | p.Asn108IlefsTer53 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 38204290 | Giulia Pascolini et al. (2024) | |
c.2189del | p.Arg730GlnfsTer3 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 38204290 | Giulia Pascolini et al. (2024) | |
c.2222dup | p.Phe742LeufsTer2 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 38204290 | Giulia Pascolini et al. (2024) | |
c.3047dup | p.Ala1017GlyfsTer6 | frameshift_variant | Familial | Maternal | - | 27824329 | Wang T , et al. (2016) | |
c.2251_2275del | p.Val751MetfsTer13 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 31452935 | Feliciano P et al. (2019) | |
c.370_381del | p.His124_Ile127del | inframe_deletion | De novo | - | Simplex | 38764027 | Ruohao Wu et al. (2024) | |
c.1026dup | p.Val343CysfsTer56 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25418537 | O'Roak BJ , et al. (2014) | |
c.2499del | p.Val834SerfsTer80 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 31406558 | Munnich A , et al. (2019) | |
c.2155del | p.Tyr719ThrfsTer9 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 35887114 | Levchenko O et al. (2022) | |
c.2491_2494del | p.Leu831IlefsTer82 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 28191889 | Stessman HA , et al. (2017) | |
c.3066_3069del | p.Asp1022GlufsTer4 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 28191889 | Stessman HA , et al. (2017) | |
c.2496_2499del | p.Asn832LysfsTer81 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 32275126 | Shillington A et al. (2020) | |
c.2153_2165del | p.Thr718ArgfsTer6 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 24531329 | Helsmoortel C , et al. (2014) | |
c.2491_2494del | p.Leu831IlefsTer82 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 24531329 | Helsmoortel C , et al. (2014) | |
c.2496_2499del | p.Asn832LysfsTer81 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 24531329 | Helsmoortel C , et al. (2014) | |
c.1676dup | p.His559GlnfsTer3 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 38637827 | Claudio D'Incal et al. (2024) | |
c.2250_2274del | p.Val751MetfsTer13 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Multiplex | 30504930 | Guo H , et al. (2018) | |
c.1046_1047del | p.Leu349ArgfsTer49 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 26168855 | Gozes I , et al. (2015) | |
c.2287dup | p.Ser763PhefsTer3 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.642_649del | p.Asn214LysfsTer4 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | |
c.1026dup | p.Val343CysfsTer56 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.2491_2494del | p.Leu831IlefsTer82 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 38204290 | Giulia Pascolini et al. (2024) | |
c.2496_2499del | p.Asn832LysfsTer81 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 38204290 | Giulia Pascolini et al. (2024) | |
c.1222_1223del | p.Lys408ValfsTer31 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 22495309 | O'Roak BJ , et al. (2012) | |
c.642_651del | p.Asn214LysfsTer31 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 33624935 | Abe-Hatano C et al. (2021) | |
c.2156_2157insT | p.Glu720ArgfsTer15 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 23160955 | O'Roak BJ , et al. (2012) | |
c.2491_2494del | p.Leu831IlefsTer82 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 38254177 | Chuanhui Ge et al. (2024) | |
c.2155del | p.Tyr719ThrfsTer9 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | Not maternal | Simplex | 30564305 | Guo H , et al. (2018) | |
c.2866_2869del | p.Glu956LeufsTer35 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | |
c.2318_2319del | p.Lys773IlefsTer14 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | Unknown | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | |
c.1222_1223del | p.Lys408ValfsTer31 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.2424_2427del | p.Lys809SerfsTer19 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.2496_2499del | p.Asn832LysfsTer81 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 37460657 | Bartolomaeus T et al. (2023) | |
c.2798_2799del | p.Gly933ValfsTer10 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | - | Multiplex | 31038196 | Callaghan DB , et al. (2019) | |
c.3280_3281insCC | p.Gly1094AlafsTer5 | frameshift_variant | Familial | Maternal | Simplex | 23160955 | O'Roak BJ , et al. (2012) | |
c.2156dup | p.Tyr719Ter | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25533962 | Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study (2014) | |
c.3047_3048insA | p.Ala1017GlyfsTer6 | frameshift_variant | Familial | Maternal | Multiplex | 37506195 | Cirnigliaro M et al. (2023) | |
c.1222_1223del | p.Lys408ValfsTer31 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25533962 | Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study (2014) | |
c.2496_2499del | p.Asn832LysfsTer81 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25533962 | Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study (2014) | |
c.2497_2500del | p.Lys833SerfsTer80 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25533962 | Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study (2014) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
High Confidence, Syndromic
Score Delta: Score remained at 1S
criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaWe considered a rigorous statistical comparison between cases and controls, yielding genome-wide statistical significance, with independent replication, to be the strongest possible evidence for a gene. These criteria were relaxed slightly for category 2.
The syndromic category includes mutations that are associated with a substantial degree of increased risk and consistently linked to additional characteristics not required for an ASD diagnosis. If there is independent evidence implicating a gene in idiopathic ASD, it will be listed as "#S" (e.g., 2S, 3S, etc.). If there is no such independent evidence, the gene will be listed simply as "S."
1/1/2021
Score remained at 1
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A detailed clinical characterization of 78 individuals with likely disruptive ADNP mutations in Van Dijck et al., 2018 reported that autistic features were present in 93% (64/69) of individuals, with 67% reported to have a clinical diagnosis of ASD.
10/1/2020
Score remained at 1
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A detailed clinical characterization of 78 individuals with likely disruptive ADNP mutations in Van Dijck et al., 2018 reported that autistic features were present in 93% (64/69) of individuals, with 67% reported to have a clinical diagnosis of ASD.
Reports Added
[Expansion of the clinical phenotype associated with mutations in activity-dependent neuroprotective protein2014] [Challenges and opportunities in the investigation of unexplained intellectual disability using family-based whole-exome sequencing2015] [Novel features of Helsmoortel-Van der Aa/ADNP syndrome in a boy with a known pathogenic mutation in the ADNP gene detected by exome sequencing2017] [The Eight and a Half Year Journey of Undiagnosed AD: Gene Sequencing and Funding of Advanced Genetic Testing Has Led to Hope and New Beginnings2017] [Mutation in the ADNP gene associated with Noonan syndrome features2018] [Cellular and animal models of skin alterations in the autism-related ADNP syndrome2019] [Large-scale targeted sequencing identifies risk genes for neurodevelopmental disorders2020]7/1/2020
Score remained at 1
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A detailed clinical characterization of 78 individuals with likely disruptive ADNP mutations in Van Dijck et al., 2018 reported that autistic features were present in 93% (64/69) of individuals, with 67% reported to have a clinical diagnosis of ASD.
4/1/2020
Score remained at 1
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A detailed clinical characterization of 78 individuals with likely disruptive ADNP mutations in Van Dijck et al., 2018 reported that autistic features were present in 93% (64/69) of individuals, with 67% reported to have a clinical diagnosis of ASD.
1/1/2020
Score remained at 1
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A detailed clinical characterization of 78 individuals with likely disruptive ADNP mutations in Van Dijck et al., 2018 reported that autistic features were present in 93% (64/69) of individuals, with 67% reported to have a clinical diagnosis of ASD.
10/1/2019
Score remained at 1
New Scoring Scheme
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A detailed clinical characterization of 78 individuals with likely disruptive ADNP mutations in Van Dijck et al., 2018 reported that autistic features were present in 93% (64/69) of individuals, with 67% reported to have a clinical diagnosis of ASD.
7/1/2019
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A detailed clinical characterization of 78 individuals with likely disruptive ADNP mutations in Van Dijck et al., 2018 reported that autistic features were present in 93% (64/69) of individuals, with 67% reported to have a clinical diagnosis of ASD.
Reports Added
[Developmental Phenotype of the Rare Case of DJ Caused by a Unique ADNP Gene De Novo Mutation.2019] [Lessons Learned from Large-Scale, First-Tier Clinical Exome Sequencing in a Highly Consanguineous Population.2019] [Impact of on-site clinical genetics consultations on diagnostic rate in children and young adults with autism spectrum disorder.2019]4/1/2019
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A detailed clinical characterization of 78 individuals with likely disruptive ADNP mutations in Van Dijck et al., 2018 reported that autistic features were present in 93% (64/69) of individuals, with 67% reported to have a clinical diagnosis of ASD.
1/1/2019
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A detailed clinical characterization of 78 individuals with likely disruptive ADNP mutations in Van Dijck et al., 2018 reported that autistic features were present in 93% (64/69) of individuals, with 67% reported to have a clinical diagnosis of ASD.
Reports Added
[Genetic Diagnostic Evaluation of Trio-Based Whole Exome Sequencing Among Children With Diagnosed or Suspected Autism Spectrum Disorder.2018] [Inherited and multiple de novo mutations in autism/developmental delay risk genes suggest a multifactorial model.2018] [Both rare and common genetic variants contribute to autism in the Faroe Islands.2019]10/1/2018
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A detailed clinical characterization of 78 individuals with likely disruptive ADNP mutations in Van Dijck et al., 2018 reported that autistic features were present in 93% (64/69) of individuals, with 67% reported to have a clinical diagnosis of ASD.
7/1/2018
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR 0.01, meaning that this gene had a 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017). A detailed clinical characterization of 78 individuals with likely disruptive ADNP mutations in Van Dijck et al., 2018 reported that autistic features were present in 93% (64/69) of individuals, with 67% reported to have a clinical diagnosis of ASD.
7/1/2017
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants in ADNP were identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were identified in patients with ASD in Helsmoortel et al., 2014, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR ? 0.01, meaning that this gene had a ? 99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017).
4/1/2017
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were recently identified in patients with ASD, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR ?0.01, meaning that this gene had a ?99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017).
Reports Added
[Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations.2012] [Multiplex targeted sequencing identifies recurrently mutated genes in autism spectrum disorders.2012] [A SWI/SNF-related autism syndrome caused by de novo mutations in ADNP.2014] [The transcriptional regulator ADNP links the BAF (SWI/SNF) complexes with autism.2014] [Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism.2014] [Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders.2014] [The NAP motif of activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) regulates dendritic spines through microtubule end binding proteins.2014] [Activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) exhibits striking sexual dichotomy impacting on autistic and Alzheimer's pathologies.2015] [The Compassionate Side of Neuroscience: Tony Sermone's Undiagnosed Genetic Journey-ADNP Mutation.2015] [Targeted DNA Sequencing from Autism Spectrum Disorder Brains Implicates Multiple Genetic Mechanisms.2015] [Low load for disruptive mutations in autism genes and their biased transmission.2015] [Comprehensive molecular testing in patients with high functioning autism spectrum disorder.2016] [Additional data on the clinical phenotype of Helsmoortel-Van der Aa syndrome associated with a novel truncating mutation in ADNP gene.2016] [Meta-analysis of 2,104 trios provides support for 10 new genes for intellectual disability2016] [Genome-wide characteristics of de novo mutations in autism2016] [De novo genic mutations among a Chinese autism spectrum disorder cohort.2016] [Clinical exome sequencing: results from 2819 samples reflecting 1000 families.2016] [Targeted sequencing identifies 91 neurodevelopmental-disorder risk genes with autism and developmental-disability biases.2017] [Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder2017] [Further evidence that a blepharophimosis syndrome phenotype is associated with a specific class of mutation in the ADNP gene.2017]1/1/2017
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were recently identified in patients with ASD, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR ?0.01, meaning that this gene had a ?99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017).
10/1/2016
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were recently identified in patients with ASD, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR ?0.01, meaning that this gene had a ?99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017).
7/1/2016
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were recently identified in patients with ASD, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR ?0.01, meaning that this gene had a ?99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017).
4/1/2016
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were recently identified in patients with ASD, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR ?0.01, meaning that this gene had a ?99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017).
Reports Added
[Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations.2012] [Multiplex targeted sequencing identifies recurrently mutated genes in autism spectrum disorders.2012] [A SWI/SNF-related autism syndrome caused by de novo mutations in ADNP.2014] [The transcriptional regulator ADNP links the BAF (SWI/SNF) complexes with autism.2014] [Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism.2014] [Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders.2014] [The NAP motif of activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) regulates dendritic spines through microtubule end binding proteins.2014] [Activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) exhibits striking sexual dichotomy impacting on autistic and Alzheimer's pathologies.2015] [The Compassionate Side of Neuroscience: Tony Sermone's Undiagnosed Genetic Journey-ADNP Mutation.2015] [Targeted DNA Sequencing from Autism Spectrum Disorder Brains Implicates Multiple Genetic Mechanisms.2015] [Low load for disruptive mutations in autism genes and their biased transmission.2015] [Comprehensive molecular testing in patients with high functioning autism spectrum disorder.2016] [Additional data on the clinical phenotype of Helsmoortel-Van der Aa syndrome associated with a novel truncating mutation in ADNP gene.2016]1/1/2016
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were recently identified in patients with ASD, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR ?0.01, meaning that this gene had a ?99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760). This gene was identified in Iossifov et al. 2015 as a strong candidate to be an ASD risk gene based on a combination of de novo mutational evidence and the absence or very low frequency of mutations in controls (PMID 26401017).
Reports Added
[Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations.2012] [Multiplex targeted sequencing identifies recurrently mutated genes in autism spectrum disorders.2012] [A SWI/SNF-related autism syndrome caused by de novo mutations in ADNP.2014] [The transcriptional regulator ADNP links the BAF (SWI/SNF) complexes with autism.2014] [Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism.2014] [Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders.2014] [The NAP motif of activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) regulates dendritic spines through microtubule end binding proteins.2014] [Activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) exhibits striking sexual dichotomy impacting on autistic and Alzheimer's pathologies.2015] [The Compassionate Side of Neuroscience: Tony Sermone's Undiagnosed Genetic Journey-ADNP Mutation.2015] [Targeted DNA Sequencing from Autism Spectrum Disorder Brains Implicates Multiple Genetic Mechanisms.2015] [Low load for disruptive mutations in autism genes and their biased transmission.2015] [Comprehensive molecular testing in patients with high functioning autism spectrum disorder.2016]7/1/2015
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were recently identified in patients with ASD, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR ?0.01, meaning that this gene had a ?99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760).
Reports Added
[Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations.2012] [Multiplex targeted sequencing identifies recurrently mutated genes in autism spectrum disorders.2012] [A SWI/SNF-related autism syndrome caused by de novo mutations in ADNP.2014] [The transcriptional regulator ADNP links the BAF (SWI/SNF) complexes with autism.2014] [Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism.2014] [Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders.2014] [The NAP motif of activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) regulates dendritic spines through microtubule end binding proteins.2014] [Activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) exhibits striking sexual dichotomy impacting on autistic and Alzheimer's pathologies.2015] [The Compassionate Side of Neuroscience: Tony Sermone's Undiagnosed Genetic Journey-ADNP Mutation.2015]1/1/2015
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were recently identified in patients with ASD, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR ?0.01, meaning that this gene had a ?99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760).
10/1/2014
Score remained at 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were recently identified in patients with ASD, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329). Analysis of rare coding variation in 3,871 ASD cases and 9,937 ancestry-matched or paternal controls from the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) identified ADNP as a gene meeting high statistical significance with a FDR ?0.01, meaning that this gene had a ?99% chance of being a true autism gene (PMID 25363760).
7/1/2014
Increased from No data to 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were recently identified in patients with ASD, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329)
Reports Added
[Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations.2012] [Multiplex targeted sequencing identifies recurrently mutated genes in autism spectrum disorders.2012] [A SWI/SNF-related autism syndrome caused by de novo mutations in ADNP.2014] [The transcriptional regulator ADNP links the BAF (SWI/SNF) complexes with autism.2014] [The NAP motif of activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) regulates dendritic spines through microtubule end binding proteins.2014]4/1/2014
Increased from No data to 1S
Description
Two de novo frameshift variants identified in unrelated simplex ASD cases (PMIDs 22495309 and 23160955). An additional seven de novo LoF variants were recently identified in patients with ASD, giving a current total of nine de novo LoF variants in ADNP gene in ASD cases; probability of detecting eight or more de novo truncating events in ADNP given as P=2.65 x 10-18 in this report. The frequency of shared clinical characteristics in ASD cases with LoF variants in ADNP (intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms) led the authors to conclude that ADNP mutations resulted in an autism syndrome (PMID 24531329)
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.61812008096142
Ranking 91/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 0.9989040999292
Ranking 1089/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Iossifov Probability Score
Score 0.955
Ranking 78/239 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 3.2505367123925E-5
Ranking 10/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Larsen Cumulative Evidence Score
Score 212
Ranking 3/461 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
External PIN Data
Interactome
- Protein Binding
- DNA Binding
- RNA Binding
- Protein Modification
- Direct Regulation
- ASD-Linked Genes
Interaction Table
Interactor Symbol | Interactor Name | Interactor Organism | Interactor Type | Entrez ID | Uniprot ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-Sep | septin 2 | Human | Protein Binding | 4735 | Q15019 |
ADNP | activity-dependent neuroprotector homeobox | Human | DNA Binding | 23394 | Q9H2P0 |
APOE | apolipoprotein E | Mouse | Protein Binding | 11816 | P08226 |
ARID1A | AT rich interactive domain 1A (SWI-like) | Human | Protein Binding | 8289 | O14497 |
CBX1 | chromobox homolog 1 | Human | Protein Binding | 10951 | P83916 |
CBX3 | chromobox homolog 3 | Human | Protein Binding | 11335 | Q13185 |
CBX5 | chromobox homolog 5 | Human | Protein Binding | 23468 | P45973 |
CDC27 | cell division cycle 27 | Human | Protein Binding | 996 | G3V1C4 |
CTSC | cathepsin C | Mouse | Protein Binding | 13032 | P97821 |
CTSZ | cathepsin Z | Mouse | Protein Binding | 64138 | Q9WUU7 |
EB1 | Microtubule-associated protein RP/EB family member 1 | Human | Protein Binding | 22919 | Q15691 |
EB2 | Microtubule-associated protein RP/EB family member 2 | Human | Protein Binding | 10982 | Q15555 |
EB3 | Microtubule-associated protein RP/EB family member 3 | Human | Protein Binding | 22924 | Q9UPY8 |
EBNA1BP2 | EBNA1 binding protein 2 | Human | Protein Binding | 10969 | H7C2Q8 |
EMD | emerin | Human | Protein Binding | 2010 | P50402 |
H3F3A | H3 histone, family 3A | Human | Protein Binding | 3020 | P84243 |
HBB | hemoglobin, beta adult major chain | Mouse | DNA Binding | 15129 | P02088 |
HDAC1 | histone deacetylase 1 | Human | Protein Binding | 3065 | Q13547 |
HDAC11 | histone deacetylase 11 | Human | Protein Binding | 79885 | Q96DB2 |
HDAC7 | histone deacetylase 7 | Human | Protein Binding | 51564 | Q8WUI4 |
MAP1LC3B | microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta | Human | Protein Binding | 81631 | Q9GZQ8 |
MAPRE1 | microtubule-associated protein, RP/EB family, member 1 | Human | Protein Binding | 22919 | Q15691 |
Mapre2 | microtubule-associated protein, RP/EB family, member 2 | Mouse | Protein Binding | 212307 | Q8R001 |
MAPRE3 | microtubule-associated protein, RP/EB family, member 3 | Human | Protein Binding | 22924 | Q9UPY8 |
MTNR1A | melatonin receptor 1A | Mouse | Protein Binding | 17773 | Q61184 |
MYC | v-myc myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (avian) | Human | Protein Binding | 4609 | P01106 |
MYL2 | myosin, light polypeptide 2, regulatory, cardiac, slow | Mouse | Protein Binding | 17906 | P51667 |
NCAPH2 | non-SMC condensin II complex, subunit H2 | Human | Protein Binding | 29781 | Q6IBW4 |
NEUROG1 | neurogenin 1 | Mouse | Protein Binding | 18014 | P70660 |
NFIA | nuclear factor I/A | Human | Protein Binding | 4774 | Q12857 |
PHGDH | phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase | Human | Protein Binding | 26227 | O43175 |
POLG2 | polymerase (DNA directed), gamma 2, accessory subunit | Human | Protein Binding | NM_007215 | E5KS15 |
QPRT | Nicotinate-nucleotide pyrophosphorylase [carboxylating] | Human | Protein Binding | 23475 | Q15274 |
Rbfox1 | RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog (C. elegans) 1 | Mouse | RNA Binding | 268859 | Q9JJ43 |
RRS1 | RRS1 ribosome biogenesis regulator homolog (S. cerevisiae) | Human | Protein Binding | 23212 | Q15050 |
SAP18 | Sin3A-associated protein, 18kDa | Human | Protein Binding | 10284 | O00422 |
Sfpq | splicing factor proline/glutamine-rich | Mouse | Protein Binding | 71514 | Q8VIJ6 |
SIRT7 | sirtuin 7 | Human | Protein Binding | 51547 | Q9NRC8 |
Smarca2 | SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 2 | Mouse | Protein Binding | 67155 | Q6DIC0 |
SMARCA4 | SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 4 | Human | Protein Binding | 6597 | A7E2E1 |
SMARCC2 | SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily c, member 2 | Human | Protein Binding | 6601 | Q8TAQ2 |
Srcin1 | SRC kinase signaling inhibitor 1 | Mouse | Protein Binding | 56013 | Q9QWI6 |
SUMO2 | SMT3 suppressor of mif two 3 homolog 2 (S. cerevisiae) | Human | Protein Binding | 6613 | P61956 |
TOP3B | topoisomerase (DNA) III beta | Human | Protein Binding | 8940 | O95985 |
Tubb2a | tubulin, beta 2A class IIA | Mouse | Protein Binding | 22151 | Q7TMM9 |
ZNF524 | Zinc finger protein 524 | Human | Protein Binding | 147807 | Q96C55 |
ZNF581 | zinc finger protein 581 | Human | Protein Binding | 51545 | Q9P0T4 |
ZSCAN20 | zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 20 | Human | Protein Binding | 7579 | P17040 |