CLTCclathrin heavy chain
Autism Reports / Total Reports
5 / 6Rare Variants / Common Variants
20 / 0Aliases
-Associated Syndromes
-Chromosome Band
17q23.1Associated Disorders
-Relevance to Autism
CLTC was classified as an ASD candidate gene in males in Kim et al., 2024 following a combined TADA analysis consisting of a novel Korean ASD cohort in addition to the Simons Simplex Collection and the SPARK cohort. De novo ASD-associated variants in CLTC included three de novo loss-of-function variants (two in probands from the Autism Sequencing Consortium, one in a proband from the MSSNG cohort), a de novo missense variant predicted to be deleterious by REVEL and MPC in a SPARK proband, and a de novo missense variant with a CADD score > 20 in a Korean ASD proband (De Rubeis et al., 2012; Satterstrom et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023; Kim et al., 2024). Heterozygous mutations in this gene are also responsible for autosomal dominant intellectual developmental disorder-56 (MRD56; OMIM 617854); autism reported in 3/10 individuals with de novo CLTC variants in Nabais S et al., 2020.
Molecular Function
Clathrin is a major protein component of the cytoplasmic face of intracellular organelles, called coated vesicles and coated pits. These specialized organelles are involved in the intracellular trafficking of receptors and endocytosis of a variety of macromolecules. The basic subunit of the clathrin coat is composed of three heavy chains and three light chains.
External Links
SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to CLTC (6 Reports)
# | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Support | Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
2 | Support | - | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | No | ASD, ADHD |
3 | Support | Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | Yes | - |
4 | Support | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
5 | Support | - | Wang J et al. (2023) | Yes | - |
6 | Primary | - | Soo-Whee Kim et al. (2024) | Yes | - |
Rare Variants (20)
Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
c.4717T>C | p.Cys1573Arg | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1962C>G | p.Tyr654Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.445G>T | p.Ala149Ser | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 39334436 | Soo-Whee Kim et al. (2024) | |
c.3048T>C | p.Ser1016= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | - | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | |
c.4133T>C | p.Met1378Thr | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 37393044 | Wang J et al. (2023) | |
c.2272C>T | p.Arg758Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.4366C>T | p.Gln1456Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.4615C>T | p.Gln1539Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.2919+1G>C | p.? | splice_site_variant | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.3065+1G>A | p.? | splice_site_variant | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.3766-2A>G | p.? | splice_site_variant | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.430dup | p.Arg144ProfsTer4 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2669C>T | p.Pro890Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.3765G>C | p.Glu1255Asp | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.1953del | p.Val652SerfsTer9 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.2325_2327del | p.Ile776del | inframe_deletion | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.2794_2796del | p.Asn932del | inframe_deletion | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.3621_3623del | p.Asp1207del | inframe_deletion | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.1226del | p.Gly409ValfsTer25 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) | |
c.4481del | p.Ser1494CysfsTer32 | frameshift_variant | Unknown | Not maternal | - | 31776469 | Maria J Nabais Sá et al. (2020) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
Suggestive Evidence


criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaThe literature is replete with relatively small studies of candidate genes, using either common or rare variant approaches, which do not reach the criteria set out for categories 1 and 2. Genes that had two such lines of supporting evidence were placed in category 3, and those with one line of evidence were placed in category 4. Some additional lines of "accessory evidence" (indicated as "acc" in the score cards) could also boost a gene from category 4 to 3.
10/1/2024
Initial score established: 3
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.50337263639699
Ranking 1949/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 0.99999999331335
Ranking 127/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 0.92917079268886
Ranking 11099/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Zhang D Score
Score 0.30692400577349
Ranking 2631/20870 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]