CXXC5CXXC finger protein 5
Autism Reports / Total Reports
4 / 5Rare Variants / Common Variants
5 / 0Aliases
-Associated Syndromes
-Chromosome Band
5q31.2Associated Disorders
-Relevance to Autism
Chen et al., 2025 integrated cortex cell-specific cis-regulatory element annotations, a deep learning-based variant prediction model, and massively parallel reporter assays to systematically evaluate the functional impact of 227,878 non-coding de novo mutations (ncDNMs) in ASD probands from Simons Simplex Collection (SSC) and Autism Speaks MSSNG resource (MSSNG) cohorts and identified ncDNMs that down-regulated expression of the CXCC5 gene in two SSC probands. Additional de novo variants in this gene, including a loss-of-function variant and two missense variants, have been identified in ASD probands (De Rubeis et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2022; Fu et al., 2022).
Molecular Function
The protein encoded by this gene is a retinoid-inducible nuclear protein containing a CXXC-type zinc finger motif. The encoded protein is involved in myelopoiesis, is required for DNA damage-induced p53 activation, regulates the differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts into myocytes, and negatively regulates cutaneous wound healing. CXXC5 was identified as a novel BMP4-regulated modulator of Wnt signaling in neural stem cells in Andersson et al., 2009.
SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to CXXC5 (5 Reports)
| # | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Support | - | Therese Andersson et al. (2009) | No | - |
| 2 | Support | Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
| 3 | Support | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
| 4 | Support | - | Fu JM et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
| 5 | Primary | - | Congcong Chen et al. () | Yes | - |
Rare Variants (5)
| Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G>C | - | intergenic_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 40738258 | Congcong Chen et al. () | |
| c.799G>A | p.Ala267Thr | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982160 | Fu JM et al. (2022) | |
| c.-161+847T>G | - | intron_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 40738258 | Congcong Chen et al. () | |
| c.246C>G | p.Tyr82Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Multiplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
| c.430C>A | p.Leu144Met | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
Suggestive Evidence

criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaThe literature is replete with relatively small studies of candidate genes, using either common or rare variant approaches, which do not reach the criteria set out for categories 1 and 2. Genes that had two such lines of supporting evidence were placed in category 3, and those with one line of evidence were placed in category 4. Some additional lines of "accessory evidence" (indicated as "acc" in the score cards) could also boost a gene from category 4 to 3.
10/1/2025
Initial score established: 3
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.49543563908692
Ranking 2974/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 0.79535527912222
Ranking 3968/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 0.92830595160348
Ranking 10882/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Zhang D Score
Score -0.039107577629542
Ranking 10021/20870 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]