CYFIP2cytoplasmic FMR1 interacting protein 2
Autism Reports / Total Reports
5 / 8Rare Variants / Common Variants
20 / 0Aliases
-Associated Syndromes
-Chromosome Band
5q33.3Associated Disorders
-Relevance to Autism
A de novo missense variant with an MPC score > 2 was identified in the CYFIP2 gene in a Korean ASD proband in Kim et al., 2024; this gene was subsequently classified as an ASD candidate gene in males following a combined TADA analysis consisting of the Korean ASD cohort described in Kim et al., 2024 in addition to the Simons Simplex Collection and the SPARK cohort. A de novo loss-of-function variant and seven de novo missense variants, including three missense variants with MPC scores>2, were previously identified in the CYFIP2 gene in ASD probands from the Autism Sequencing Consortium and the SPARK cohort (Satterstrom et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2022; Fu et al., 2022; Trost et al., 2022). Heterozygous variants in CYFIP2 are also responsible for developmental and epileptic encephalopathy-65 (DEE65; OMIM 618008); Zweier et al., 2019 reported that, of the 12 individuals with de novo CYFIP2 variants who presented with developmental delay/intellectual disability and epilepsy in their cohort, one also presented with autism spectrum disorder while another presented with autistic features. Han et al., 2015 found that Cyfip2(+/-) mice exhibited behavioral phenotypes similar to Fmr1-null (Fmr1(-/y)) mice, an animal model of Fragile X syndrome.
Molecular Function
Predicted to enable small GTPase binding activity. Involved in several processes, including activation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity; cell-cell adhesion; and regulation of postsynapse assembly. Located in perinuclear region of cytoplasm and synapse. Part of SCAR complex. Implicated in developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 65.
External Links
SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to CYFIP2 (8 Reports)
# | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Support | - | Kihoon Han et al. (2015) | No | - |
2 | Support | - | Markus Zweier et al. (2019) | No | ASD or autistic features, ADHD |
3 | Support | Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | Yes | - |
4 | Support | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
5 | Support | - | Fu JM et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
6 | Support | - | Trost B et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
7 | Support | - | Liene Thys et al. (2024) | No | ASD, ID |
8 | Primary | - | Soo-Whee Kim et al. (2024) | Yes | - |
Rare Variants (20)
Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
c.1900C>T | p.Arg634Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1442C>T | p.Ala481Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982160 | Fu JM et al. (2022) | |
c.1316G>A | p.Arg439His | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1363G>A | p.Ala455Thr | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2420C>T | p.Thr807Met | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2506G>A | p.Gly836Ser | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2414G>A | p.Arg805Gln | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 36368308 | Trost B et al. (2022) | |
c.1992C>G | p.Ile664Met | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 39213953 | Liene Thys et al. (2024) | |
c.3669+1G>T | p.? | splice_site_variant | De novo | - | - | 30664714 | Markus Zweier et al. (2019) | |
c.354G>A | p.Glu118= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | - | 39334436 | Soo-Whee Kim et al. (2024) | |
c.259C>T | p.Arg87Cys | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 30664714 | Markus Zweier et al. (2019) | |
c.1292C>T | p.Ala431Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 39334436 | Soo-Whee Kim et al. (2024) | |
c.322T>C | p.Tyr108His | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 30664714 | Markus Zweier et al. (2019) | |
c.1083C>T | p.Ser361= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1363G>C | p.Ala455Pro | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 30664714 | Markus Zweier et al. (2019) | |
c.1992C>G | p.Ile664Met | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 30664714 | Markus Zweier et al. (2019) | |
c.1993G>A | p.Glu665Lys | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 30664714 | Markus Zweier et al. (2019) | |
c.2170G>C | p.Asp724His | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 30664714 | Markus Zweier et al. (2019) | |
c.2174A>G | p.Gln725Arg | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 30664714 | Markus Zweier et al. (2019) | |
c.3682G>A | p.Val1228Met | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
Suggestive Evidence


Score Delta: Score remained at 3
criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaThe literature is replete with relatively small studies of candidate genes, using either common or rare variant approaches, which do not reach the criteria set out for categories 1 and 2. Genes that had two such lines of supporting evidence were placed in category 3, and those with one line of evidence were placed in category 4. Some additional lines of "accessory evidence" (indicated as "acc" in the score cards) could also boost a gene from category 4 to 3.
10/1/2024

Increased from to 3
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.55504621811759
Ranking 1348/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 0.99999860259371
Ranking 322/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 0.94756162634757
Ranking 17326/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Zhang D Score
Score 0.4880349135074
Ranking 604/20870 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]