Human Gene Module / Chromosome 8 / MCPH1

MCPH1microcephalin 1

SFARI Gene Score
2
Strong Candidate Criteria 2.1
Autism Reports / Total Reports
12 / 19
Rare Variants / Common Variants
21 / 0
Aliases
MCPH1, MCT,  BRIT1,  FLJ12847
Associated Syndromes
-
Chromosome Band
8p23.1
Associated Disorders
-
Relevance to Autism

Studies have found rare variants in the MCPH1 gene that are associated with autism (e.g. Ozgen et al., 2009; Neale et al., 2012).

Molecular Function

This protein is implicated in chromosome condensation and DNA damage induced cellular responses. May play a role in neurogenesis and regulation of the size of the cerebral cortex.

SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to MCPH1 (19 Reports)
# Type Title Author, Year Autism Report Associated Disorders
1 Highly Cited Identification of microcephalin, a protein implicated in determining the size of the human brain Jackson AP , et al. (2002) No -
2 Highly Cited Microcephalin, a gene regulating brain size, continues to evolve adaptively in humans Evans PD , et al. (2005) No -
3 Support Transmitted duplication of 8p23.1-8p23.2 associated with speech delay, autism and learning difficulties Glancy M , et al. (2008) Yes -
4 Recent Recommendation Microcephalin and pericentrin regulate mitotic entry via centrosome-associated Chk1 Tibelius A , et al. (2009) No -
5 Primary Copy number changes of the microcephalin 1 gene (MCPH1) in patients with autism spectrum disorders Ozgen HM , et al. (2009) Yes -
6 Recent Recommendation A pocket on the surface of the N-terminal BRCT domain of Mcph1 is required to prevent abnormal chromosome condensation Richards MW , et al. (2009) No -
7 Support Social Responsiveness Scale-aided analysis of the clinical impact of copy number variations in autism van Daalen E , et al. (2011) Yes -
8 Recent Recommendation Molecular basis for the association of microcephalin (MCPH1) protein with the cell division cycle protein 27 (Cdc27) subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex Singh N , et al. (2011) No -
9 Support Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders Neale BM , et al. (2012) Yes -
10 Support A discovery resource of rare copy number variations in individuals with autism spectrum disorder Prasad A , et al. (2013) Yes -
11 Support Refinement and discovery of new hotspots of copy-number variation associated with autism spectrum disorder Girirajan S , et al. (2013) Yes -
12 Support Accelerating novel candidate gene discovery in neurogenetic disorders via whole-exome sequencing of prescreened multiplex consanguineous families Alazami AM , et al. (2015) No -
13 Recent Recommendation De Novo Synonymous Mutations in Regulatory Elements Contribute to the Genetic Etiology of Autism and Schizophrenia Takata A , et al. (2016) No -
14 Support Rates, distribution and implications of postzygotic mosaic mutations in autism spectrum disorder Lim ET , et al. (2017) Yes -
15 Support Targeted sequencing and functional analysis reveal brain-size-related genes and their networks in autism spectrum disorders Li J , et al. (2017) Yes -
16 Support Inherited and De Novo Genetic Risk for Autism Impacts Shared Networks Ruzzo EK , et al. (2019) Yes -
17 Support - Woodbury-Smith M et al. (2022) Yes -
18 Support - Zhou X et al. (2022) Yes -
19 Support - Cirnigliaro M et al. (2023) Yes -
Rare Variants   (21)
Status Allele Change Residue Change Variant Type Inheritance Pattern Parental Transmission Family Type PubMed ID Author, Year
- - copy_number_loss De novo - - 19793310 Ozgen HM , et al. (2009)
- - complex_structural_alteration - - - 19793310 Ozgen HM , et al. (2009)
- - copy_number_loss Unknown - Unknown 23275889 Prasad A , et al. (2013)
- - copy_number_loss De novo - Simplex 21837366 van Daalen E , et al. (2011)
- - copy_number_gain Familial Maternal Simplex 18716609 Glancy M , et al. (2008)
- - copy_number_gain Familial Maternal Multiplex 19793310 Ozgen HM , et al. (2009)
c.1651G>T p.Glu551Ter stop_gained De novo - Simplex 35982159 Zhou X et al. (2022)
- - copy_number_gain Familial Maternal Simplex 23375656 Girirajan S , et al. (2013)
- - copy_number_gain Familial Paternal Simplex 23375656 Girirajan S , et al. (2013)
- - copy_number_loss Familial Maternal Simplex 23375656 Girirajan S , et al. (2013)
c.2078G>A p.Arg693His missense_variant Familial - Simplex 28831199 Li J , et al. (2017)
c.2445G>C p.Trp815Cys missense_variant De novo - Simplex 35982159 Zhou X et al. (2022)
c.974C>T p.Thr325Met missense_variant De novo - Simplex 28714951 Lim ET , et al. (2017)
- - copy_number_loss Familial Both parents Multiplex 25558065 Alazami AM , et al. (2015)
c.322C>T p.Arg108Cys missense_variant Unknown - - 35205252 Woodbury-Smith M et al. (2022)
c.2484T>A p.Pro828= synonymous_variant De novo - Simplex 22495311 Neale BM , et al. (2012)
c.1826-1G>C - splice_site_variant Familial Maternal Multiplex 31398340 Ruzzo EK , et al. (2019)
c.2445G>A p.Trp815Ter stop_gained Familial Paternal Multiplex 31398340 Ruzzo EK , et al. (2019)
c.322-1G>C - splice_site_variant Familial Maternal Multiplex 37506195 Cirnigliaro M et al. (2023)
c.1561G>T p.Glu521Ter stop_gained Familial Maternal Multiplex 37506195 Cirnigliaro M et al. (2023)
c.2145G>A p.Trp715Ter stop_gained Familial Paternal Multiplex 37506195 Cirnigliaro M et al. (2023)
Common Variants  

No common variants reported.

SFARI Gene score
2

Strong Candidate

Gene has multiple putative mutations identified (Ozgen et al., 2009; Glancy et al., 2009), yet they have not been studied in statistically convincing case-control examination.

Score Delta: Score remained at 2

2

Strong Candidate

See all Category 2 Genes

We considered a rigorous statistical comparison between cases and controls, yielding genome-wide statistical significance, with independent replication, to be the strongest possible evidence for a gene. These criteria were relaxed slightly for category 2.

4/1/2022
3
icon
2

Decreased from 3 to 2

Description

Gene has multiple putative mutations identified (Ozgen et al., 2009; Glancy et al., 2009), yet they have not been studied in statistically convincing case-control examination.

10/1/2019
4
icon
3

Decreased from 4 to 3

New Scoring Scheme
Description

Gene has multiple putative mutations identified (Ozgen et al., 2009; Glancy et al., 2009), yet they have not been studied in statistically convincing case-control examination.

Reports Added
[New Scoring Scheme]
7/1/2019
4
icon
4

Decreased from 4 to 4

Description

Gene has multiple putative mutations identified (Ozgen et al., 2009; Glancy et al., 2009), yet they have not been studied in statistically convincing case-control examination.

10/1/2017
4
icon
4

Decreased from 4 to 4

Description

Gene has multiple putative mutations identified (Ozgen et al., 2009; Glancy et al., 2009), yet they have not been studied in statistically convincing case-control examination.

7/1/2017
4
icon
4

Decreased from 4 to 4

Description

Gene has multiple putative mutations identified (Ozgen et al., 2009; Glancy et al., 2009), yet they have not been studied in statistically convincing case-control examination.

4/1/2016
4
icon
4

Decreased from 4 to 4

Description

Gene has multiple putative mutations identified (Ozgen et al., 2009; Glancy et al., 2009), yet they have not been studied in statistically convincing case-control examination.

1/1/2015
4
icon
4

Decreased from 4 to 4

Description

Gene has multiple putative mutations identified (Ozgen et al., 2009; Glancy et al., 2009), yet they have not been studied in statistically convincing case-control examination.

7/1/2014
No data
icon
4

Increased from No data to 4

Description

Gene has multiple putative mutations identified (Ozgen et al., 2009; Glancy et al., 2009), yet they have not been studied in statistically convincing case-control examination.

4/1/2014
No data
icon
4

Increased from No data to 4

Description

Gene has multiple putative mutations identified (Ozgen et al., 2009; Glancy et al., 2009), yet they have not been studied in statistically convincing case-control examination.

Krishnan Probability Score

Score 0.41294697282543

Ranking 21967/25841 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
Krishnan and colleagues generated probability scores genome-wide by using a machine learning approach on a human brain-specific gene network. The method was first presented in Nat Neurosci 19, 1454-1462 (2016), and scores for more than 25,000 RefSeq genes can be accessed in column G of supplementary table 3 (see: http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v19/n11/extref/nn.4353-S5.xlsx). A searchable browser, with the ability to view networks of associated ASD risk genes, can be found at asd.princeton.edu.
ExAC Score

Score 5.1650703068718E-18

Ranking 17877/18225 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
The Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) is a summary database of 60,706 exomes that has been widely used to estimate 'constraint' on mutation for individual genes. It was introduced by Lek et al. Nature 536, 285-291 (2016), and the ExAC browser can be found at exac.broadinstitute.org. The pLI score was developed as measure of intolerance to loss-of- function mutation. A pLI > 0.9 is generally viewed as highly constrained, and thus any loss-of- function mutations in autism in such a gene would be more likely to confer risk. For a full list of pLI scores see: ftp://ftp.broadinstitute.org/pub/ExAC_release/release0.3.1/functional_gene_constraint/fordist_cle aned_exac_nonTCGA_z_pli_rec_null_data.txt
Sanders TADA Score

Score 0.92846338633848

Ranking 10921/18665 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
The TADA score ('Transmission and De novo Association') was introduced by He et al. PLoS Genet 9(8):e1003671 (2013), and is a statistic that integrates evidence from both de novo and transmitted mutations. It forms the basis for the claim of 65 individual genes being strongly associated with autism risk at a false discovery rate of 0.1 (Sanders et al. Neuron 87, 1215-1233 (2015)). The calculated TADA score for 18,665 RefSeq genes can be found in column P of Supplementary Table 6 in the Sanders et al. paper (the column headed 'tadaFdrAscSscExomeSscAgpSmallDel'), which represents a combined analysis of exome data and small de novo deletions (see www.cell.com/cms/attachment/2038545319/2052606711/mmc7.xlsx).
Larsen Cumulative Evidence Score

Score 1

Ranking 426/461 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
Larsen and colleagues generated gene scores based on the sum of evidence for all available ASD-associated variants in a gene, with assessments based on mode of inheritance, effect size, and variant frequency in the general population. The approach was first presented in Mol Autism 7:44 (2016), and scores for 461 genes can be found in column I in supplementary table 4 from that paper.
Zhang D Score

Score 0.12046437981611

Ranking 5719/20870 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
The DAMAGES score (disease-associated mutation analysis using gene expression signatures), or D score, was developed to combine evidence from de novo loss-of- function mutation with evidence from cell-type- specific gene expression in the mouse brain (specifically translational profiles of 24 specific mouse CNS cell types isolated from 6 different brain regions). Genes with positive D scores are more likely to be associated with autism risk, with higher-confidence genes having higher D scores. This statistic was first presented by Zhang & Shen (Hum Mutat 38, 204- 215 (2017), and D scores for more than 20,000 RefSeq genes can be found in column M in supplementary table 2 from that paper.
CNVs associated with MCPH1(1 CNVs)
8p23.1 47 Deletion-Duplication 70  /  442
Submit New Gene

Report an Error