PAPOLGpoly(A) polymerase gamma
Autism Reports / Total Reports
5 / 6Rare Variants / Common Variants
10 / 0Aliases
-Associated Syndromes
-Chromosome Band
2p16.1Associated Disorders
-Relevance to Autism
De novo missense variants in the PAPOLG gene have been identified in three ASD probands (De Rubeis et al., 2014; Yuen et al., 2017). An integrated meta-analysis of de novo mutation data from a combined dataset of 10,927 individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders identified PAPOLG as a gene with an excess of missense variants with CADD scores > 30 (false discovery rata < 5%, count >1) (Coe et al., 2018).
Molecular Function
This gene encodes a member of the poly(A) polymerase family which catalyzes template-independent extension of the 3' end of a DNA/RNA strand. Responsible for the post-transcriptional adenylation of the 3'-terminal of mRNA precursors and several small RNAs including signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA, nuclear 7SK RNA, U2 small nuclear RNA, and ribosomal 5S RNA.
External Links
SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to PAPOLG (6 Reports)
# | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Primary | Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
2 | Support | Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder | C Yuen RK et al. (2017) | Yes | - |
3 | Recent Recommendation | Neurodevelopmental disease genes implicated by de novo mutation and copy number variation morbidity | Coe BP , et al. (2018) | No | - |
4 | Support | Inherited and De Novo Genetic Risk for Autism Impacts Shared Networks | Ruzzo EK , et al. (2019) | Yes | - |
5 | Support | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
6 | Support | - | Cirnigliaro M et al. (2023) | Yes | - |
Rare Variants (10)
Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
c.1396+3A>G | - | splice_region_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.816T>G | p.Phe272Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.940A>T | p.Ile314Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1308G>T | p.Trp436Cys | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1918A>G | p.Thr640Ala | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.816T>G | p.Phe272Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1249C>A | p.Pro417Thr | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | |
c.947C>T | p.Thr316Ile | missense_variant | De novo | - | Multiplex | 28263302 | C Yuen RK et al. (2017) | |
c.1996C>T | p.Arg666Ter | stop_gained | Familial | Paternal | Multiplex | 31398340 | Ruzzo EK , et al. (2019) | |
c.9_10del | p.Glu3AspfsTer23 | frameshift_variant | Familial | Maternal | Multiplex | 37506195 | Cirnigliaro M et al. (2023) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
Strong Candidate
De novo missense variants in the PAPOLG gene have been identified in three ASD probands (De Rubeis et al., 2014; Yuen et al., 2017). An integrated meta-analysis of de novo mutation data from a combined dataset of 10,927 individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders identified PAPOLG as a gene with an excess of missense variants with CADD scores > 30 (false discovery rata < 5%, count >1) (Coe et al., 2018).
Score Delta: Score remained at 2
criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaWe considered a rigorous statistical comparison between cases and controls, yielding genome-wide statistical significance, with independent replication, to be the strongest possible evidence for a gene. These criteria were relaxed slightly for category 2.
4/1/2022
Decreased from 3 to 2
Description
De novo missense variants in the PAPOLG gene have been identified in three ASD probands (De Rubeis et al., 2014; Yuen et al., 2017). An integrated meta-analysis of de novo mutation data from a combined dataset of 10,927 individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders identified PAPOLG as a gene with an excess of missense variants with CADD scores > 30 (false discovery rata < 5%, count >1) (Coe et al., 2018).
10/1/2019
Decreased from 4 to 3
New Scoring Scheme
Description
De novo missense variants in the PAPOLG gene have been identified in three ASD probands (De Rubeis et al., 2014; Yuen et al., 2017). An integrated meta-analysis of de novo mutation data from a combined dataset of 10,927 individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders identified PAPOLG as a gene with an excess of missense variants with CADD scores > 30 (false discovery rata < 5%, count >1) (Coe et al., 2018).
Reports Added
[New Scoring Scheme]7/1/2019
Decreased from 4 to 4
Description
De novo missense variants in the PAPOLG gene have been identified in three ASD probands (De Rubeis et al., 2014; Yuen et al., 2017). An integrated meta-analysis of de novo mutation data from a combined dataset of 10,927 individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders identified PAPOLG as a gene with an excess of missense variants with CADD scores > 30 (false discovery rata < 5%, count >1) (Coe et al., 2018).
1/1/2019
Increased from to 4
Description
De novo missense variants in the PAPOLG gene have been identified in three ASD probands (De Rubeis et al., 2014; Yuen et al., 2017). An integrated meta-analysis of de novo mutation data from a combined dataset of 10,927 individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders identified PAPOLG as a gene with an excess of missense variants with CADD scores > 30 (false discovery rata < 5%, count >1) (Coe et al., 2018).
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.49472635398899
Ranking 3465/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 0.98988839522493
Ranking 1808/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 0.58722581928436
Ranking 668/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Zhang D Score
Score 0.593482948402
Ranking 99/20870 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]