PTCH1patched 1
Autism Reports / Total Reports
10 / 15Rare Variants / Common Variants
17 / 0Aliases
-Associated Syndromes
Basal cell nevus syndrome 1Chromosome Band
9q22.32Associated Disorders
-Relevance to Autism
Trio-based whole-exome sequencing of 168 patients with low-functioning ASD at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital in Wu et al., 2025 identified a paternally-inherited loss-of-function variant in the PTCH1 gene in a patient clinically diagnosed with ASD based on DSM-5 criteria and presenting with global developmental delay/intellectual disability. A number of de novo variants in PTCH1, including a de novo loss-of-function variant and several de novo missense variants that are predicted to be deleterious, have been identified in ASD probands from the Simons Simplex Collection, the SPARK cohort, the MSSNG cohort, the Autism Sequencing Consortium, the iHART cohort, and a Japanese cohort of 262 ASD probands (Iossifov et al., 2014; Yuen et al., 2016; Takata et al., 2018; Ruzzo et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2022; Fu et al., 2022). Autism spectrum disorder or autistic traits have been reported in a subset of individuals with PTCH1-associated disorders, including basal cell nevus syndrome and somatic overgrowth with macrocephaly (Delbroek et al., 2011; Klein et al., 2019; Mashayekhi et al., 2023). Alterations in hippocampal and cortical layer structure, activity, and social behavior were observed in female Ptch1 +/- mice (Jackson et al., 2020). A prevalence estimate of autism of 4% was made in a cohort of 109 individuals from Norway with basal cell naevus syndrome caused by pathogenic PTCH1 variants (Brandtzg et al., 2025).
Molecular Function
This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly.
Reports related to PTCH1 (15 Reports)
| # | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Support | - | Hanne Delbroek et al. (2011) | No | ASD |
| 2 | Support | The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder | Iossifov I et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
| 3 | Support | Genome-wide characteristics of de novo mutations in autism | Yuen RK et al. (2016) | Yes | - |
| 4 | Support | Targeted sequencing and functional analysis reveal brain-size-related genes and their networks in autism spectrum disorders | Li J , et al. (2017) | Yes | - |
| 5 | Support | Integrative Analyses of De Novo Mutations Provide Deeper Biological Insights into Autism Spectrum Disorder | Takata A , et al. (2018) | Yes | - |
| 6 | Support | Inherited and De Novo Genetic Risk for Autism Impacts Shared Networks | Ruzzo EK , et al. (2019) | Yes | - |
| 7 | Support | - | Steven D Klein et al. (2019) | No | ASD |
| 8 | Support | - | Thomas W Jackson et al. (2020) | No | - |
| 9 | Support | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
| 10 | Support | - | Fu JM et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
| 11 | Support | - | More RP et al. (2023) | Yes | - |
| 12 | Support | - | Parisa Mashayekhi et al. (2023) | No | Autistic features |
| 13 | Support | - | Srividhya Durbagula et al. (2024) | Yes | - |
| 14 | Primary | - | Ruohao Wu et al. (2025) | Yes | - |
| 15 | Support | - | Karianne Haga Brandtzæg et al. () | No | ASD |
Rare Variants (17)
| Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | copy_number_loss | Unknown | - | - | 31639285 | Steven D Klein et al. (2019) | |
| c.2448G>A | p.Gln816= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982160 | Fu JM et al. (2022) | |
| c.3713T>C | p.Leu1238Pro | missense_variant | Unknown | - | - | 28831199 | Li J , et al. (2017) | |
| c.3274A>G | p.Ile1092Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982160 | Fu JM et al. (2022) | |
| c.654+1G>C | p.? | splice_site_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
| c.1972A>G | p.Met658Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | Unknown | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
| c.842T>C | p.Met281Thr | missense_variant | De novo | - | Multiplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
| c.2847C>T | p.Val949= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 27525107 | Yuen RK et al. (2016) | |
| c.2670C>G | p.Thr890= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | Multiplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
| c.1405G>A | p.Val469Met | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 29346770 | Takata A , et al. (2018) | |
| c.716C>T | p.Ala239Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | Multiplex | 31398340 | Ruzzo EK , et al. (2019) | |
| c.2289C>T | p.Val763= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25363768 | Iossifov I et al. (2014) | |
| c.654+1G>T | p.? | splice_site_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 37752108 | Parisa Mashayekhi et al. (2023) | |
| c.884C>T | p.Pro295Leu | missense_variant | Familial | Maternal | Multiplex | 36702863 | More RP et al. (2023) | |
| c.3932del | p.Leu1311CysfsTer61 | frameshift_variant | Familial | Paternal | - | 41127290 | Ruohao Wu et al. (2025) | |
| c.4014_4034del21 | p.Trp1339_Arg1345del | inframe_deletion | Unknown | - | - | 31639285 | Steven D Klein et al. (2019) | |
| c.3940C>T | p.Pro1314Ser | missense_variant | Familial | Paternal | Simplex | 39534727 | Srividhya Durbagula et al. (2024) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
Suggestive Evidence

criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaThe literature is replete with relatively small studies of candidate genes, using either common or rare variant approaches, which do not reach the criteria set out for categories 1 and 2. Genes that had two such lines of supporting evidence were placed in category 3, and those with one line of evidence were placed in category 4. Some additional lines of "accessory evidence" (indicated as "acc" in the score cards) could also boost a gene from category 4 to 3.
10/1/2025
Initial score established: 3
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.56794733727959
Ranking 1149/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 0.99999885730953
Ranking 310/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 0.94983219573571
Ranking 18250/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Zhang D Score
Score -0.036790188397326
Ranking 9927/20870 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]