PTPRSprotein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type S
Autism Reports / Total Reports
8 / 10Rare Variants / Common Variants
12 / 0Aliases
-Associated Syndromes
-Chromosome Band
19p13.3Associated Disorders
-Relevance to Autism
Chen et al., 2025 integrated cortex cell-specific cis-regulatory element annotations, a deep learning-based variant prediction model, and massively parallel reporter assays to systematically evaluate the functional impact of 227,878 non-coding de novo mutations (ncDNMs) in ASD probands from Simons Simplex Collection (SSC) and Autism Speaks MSSNG resource (MSSNG) cohorts and identified a ncDNM that down-regulated expression of the PTPRS gene in a MSSNG proband. Additional de novo variants in the PTPRS gene, including a loss-of-function variant and four missense variants, have been identified in ASD probands (Iossifov et al., 2014; Krumm et al., 2015; Satterstrom et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2022; Fu et al., 2022; Trost et al., 2022).
Molecular Function
The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) family. PTPs are known to be signaling molecules that regulate a variety of cellular processes including cell growth, differentiation, mitotic cycle, and oncogenic transformation. This PTP contains an extracellular region, a single transmembrane segment and two tandem intracytoplasmic catalytic domains, and thus represents a receptor-type PTP. The extracellular region of this protein is composed of multiple Ig-like and fibronectin type III-like domains. Studies of the similar gene in mice suggested that this PTP may be involved in cell-cell interaction, primary axonogenesis, and axon guidance during embryogenesis and has also been implicated in the molecular control of adult nerve repair (Thompson et al., 2003 found that mice lacking RPTPsigma exhibited an accelerated rate of functional recovery following facial nerve crush, and Kirkham et al., 2006 found that neural stem cells from protein tyrosine
SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to PTPRS (10 Reports)
| # | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Support | - | K M Thompson et al. (2003) | No | - |
| 2 | Support | - | David L Kirkham et al. (2006) | No | - |
| 3 | Support | The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder | Iossifov I et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
| 4 | Support | Excess of rare, inherited truncating mutations in autism | Krumm N , et al. (2015) | Yes | - |
| 5 | Support | Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | Yes | - |
| 6 | Support | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
| 7 | Support | - | Fu JM et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
| 8 | Support | - | Trost B et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
| 9 | Primary | - | Congcong Chen et al. () | Yes | - |
| 10 | Support | - | Richard G Boles et al. (2025) | Yes | DD, ID, epilepsy/seizures |
Rare Variants (12)
| Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G>T | - | intergenic_variant | De novo | - | Multiplex | 40738258 | Congcong Chen et al. () | |
| c.3597G>A | p.Ser1199= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982160 | Fu JM et al. (2022) | |
| c.4770-1G>C | p.? | splice_site_variant | De novo | - | Multiplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
| c.1403C>T | p.Pro468Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | Unknown | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
| c.510G>A | p.Lys170= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 36368308 | Trost B et al. (2022) | |
| c.4318+7C>T | p.? | splice_region_variant | De novo | - | - | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
| c.613A>G | p.Ser205Gly | missense_variant | De novo | - | Multiplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
| c.2517G>A | p.Ser839= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | Unknown | 36368308 | Trost B et al. (2022) | |
| c.1227C>T | p.Gly422= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | - | 41010044 | Richard G Boles et al. (2025) | |
| c.2425G>T | p.Val809Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25961944 | Krumm N , et al. (2015) | |
| c.4400C>T | p.Pro1467Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | Multiplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
| c.3930C>T | p.Pro1310= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25363768 | Iossifov I et al. (2014) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
Suggestive Evidence

criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaThe literature is replete with relatively small studies of candidate genes, using either common or rare variant approaches, which do not reach the criteria set out for categories 1 and 2. Genes that had two such lines of supporting evidence were placed in category 3, and those with one line of evidence were placed in category 4. Some additional lines of "accessory evidence" (indicated as "acc" in the score cards) could also boost a gene from category 4 to 3.
10/1/2025
Initial score established: 3
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.49463560341705
Ranking 3537/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 0.76091506045435
Ranking 4150/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 0.95008592376171
Ranking 18352/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Zhang D Score
Score 0.15989780960243
Ranking 4980/20870 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]