RSF1remodeling and spacing factor 1
Autism Reports / Total Reports
2 / 5Rare Variants / Common Variants
13 / 0Aliases
-Associated Syndromes
-Chromosome Band
11q14.1Associated Disorders
-Relevance to Autism
Jost et al., 2026 identified a total of 11 unrelated individuals harboring predominantly de novo heterozygous variants in the RSF1 gene; all individuals presented with a neurodevelopmental disorder, whether intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, or developmental delay, and from the seven individuals with detailed clinical information, unspecific and inconsistent associated features were described, including craniofacial dysmorphism, musculoskeletal, digestive, vision, and tone-associated phenotypes, epilepsy, and brain MRI anomalies. De novo missense variants in the RSF1 gene have previously been identified in ASD probands from the Autism Sequencing Consortium and the SPARK cohort (De Rubeis et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2022).
Molecular Function
This gene encodes a nuclear protein that interacts with hepatitis B virus X protein (HBX) and facilitates transcription of hepatitis B virus genes by the HBX transcription activator, suggesting a role for this interaction in the virus life cycle. This protein also interacts with SNF2H protein to form the RSF chromatin-remodeling complex, where the SNF2H subunit functions as the nucleosome-dependent ATPase, and this protein as the histone chaperone.
External Links
SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to RSF1 (5 Reports)
| # | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Support | Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
| 2 | Support | Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders | et al. (2017) | No | - |
| 3 | Support | - | Bruno LP et al. (2021) | No | Stereotypy |
| 4 | Support | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
| 5 | Primary | - | Céline Jost et al. () | No | ASD, epilepsy/seizures |
Rare Variants (13)
| Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c.2983G>T | p.Glu995Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 41606215 | Céline Jost et al. () | |
| c.1636A>G | p.Met546Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 28135719 | et al. (2017) | |
| c.2896C>T | p.Arg966Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 41606215 | Céline Jost et al. () | |
| c.4066A>T | p.Lys1356Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | Simplex | 41606215 | Céline Jost et al. () | |
| c.1385C>G | p.Thr462Arg | missense_variant | De novo | - | Unknown | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
| c.2896C>T | p.Arg966Ter | stop_gained | Familial | Paternal | - | 41606215 | Céline Jost et al. () | |
| c.3839A>G | p.Glu1280Gly | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
| c.3217G>C | p.Glu1073Gln | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 34948243 | Bruno LP et al. (2021) | |
| c.2765G>A | p.Arg922His | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 41606215 | Céline Jost et al. () | |
| c.2778G>A | p.Met926Ile | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 41606215 | Céline Jost et al. () | |
| c.3133+1G>T | - | splice_site_variant | Familial | Maternal | Simplex | 41606215 | Céline Jost et al. () | |
| c.748_755del | p.Ser250AspfsTer4 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 41606215 | Céline Jost et al. () | |
| c.341T>C | p.Met114Thr | missense_variant | De novo | - | Multiplex | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
Suggestive Evidence

criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaThe literature is replete with relatively small studies of candidate genes, using either common or rare variant approaches, which do not reach the criteria set out for categories 1 and 2. Genes that had two such lines of supporting evidence were placed in category 3, and those with one line of evidence were placed in category 4. Some additional lines of "accessory evidence" (indicated as "acc" in the score cards) could also boost a gene from category 4 to 3.
4/1/2026
Initial score established: 3
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.47563172227838
Ranking 8557/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 0.99999996257039
Ranking 166/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 0.83340429228112
Ranking 2942/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Zhang D Score
Score 0.412724220496
Ranking 1314/20870 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]