SACSsacsin molecular chaperone
Autism Reports / Total Reports
7 / 7Rare Variants / Common Variants
10 / 0Aliases
-Associated Syndromes
-Chromosome Band
13q12.12Associated Disorders
-Relevance to Autism
TADA-de novo analysis of published de novo variants in nuclear-encoded mitochondrial-related genes (NEMGs) observed in 31,058 probands with undiagnosed developmental disorder (UDD), 10,318 ASD probands, and 4,262 controls in Luo et al., 2023 identified SACS as an ASD candidate gene with a false discovery rate less than 0.01 (FDR < 0.01); among the published ASD-associated variants in this gene that were used in the TADA analysis were a de novo loss-of-function variant and four de novo damaging missense variants (Yuen et al., 2017; Takata et al., 2018; Feliciano et al., 2019; Satterstrom et al., 2020). Additional de novo coding variants in SACS have been identified in ASD probands (Iossifov et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2022).
Molecular Function
This gene encodes the sacsin protein, which includes a UbL domain at the N-terminus, a DnaJ domain, and a HEPN domain at the C-terminus. The gene is highly expressed in the central nervous system, also found in skin, skeletal muscles and at low levels in the pancreas. This gene includes a very large exon spanning more than 12.8 kb. Mutations in this gene result in autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS), a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by early-onset cerebellar ataxia with spasticity and peripheral neuropathy.
External Links
SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to SACS (7 Reports)
# | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Support | The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder | Iossifov I et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
2 | Support | Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder | C Yuen RK et al. (2017) | Yes | - |
3 | Support | Integrative Analyses of De Novo Mutations Provide Deeper Biological Insights into Autism Spectrum Disorder | Takata A , et al. (2018) | Yes | - |
4 | Support | Exome sequencing of 457 autism families recruited online provides evidence for autism risk genes | Feliciano P et al. (2019) | Yes | - |
5 | Support | Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | Yes | - |
6 | Support | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
7 | Primary | - | T Luo et al. (2024) | Yes | - |
Rare Variants (10)
Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
c.1109G>A | p.Cys370Tyr | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.8073A>G | p.Lys2691= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.11968T>C | p.Cys3990Arg | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.3745C>T | p.Gln1249Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.3045G>T | p.Trp1015Cys | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 31452935 | Feliciano P et al. (2019) | |
c.8575C>T | p.His2859Tyr | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 31452935 | Feliciano P et al. (2019) | |
c.12437C>T | p.Ser4146Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.6158A>G | p.Glu2053Gly | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 28263302 | C Yuen RK et al. (2017) | |
c.12317T>C | p.Leu4106Pro | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 29346770 | Takata A , et al. (2018) | |
c.3123G>C | p.Gln1041His | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25363768 | Iossifov I et al. (2014) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
Strong Candidate
Score Delta: Score remained at 2
criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaWe considered a rigorous statistical comparison between cases and controls, yielding genome-wide statistical significance, with independent replication, to be the strongest possible evidence for a gene. These criteria were relaxed slightly for category 2.
1/1/2024
Increased from to 2
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.56879266768152
Ranking 1095/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 6.1462947887645E-12
Ranking 17218/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 0.94832381799371
Ranking 17637/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Zhang D Score
Score 0.45307250017566
Ranking 892/20870 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]