Human Gene Module / Chromosome 13 / SACS

SACSsacsin molecular chaperone

SFARI Gene Score
2
Strong Candidate Criteria 2.1
Autism Reports / Total Reports
7 / 7
Rare Variants / Common Variants
10 / 0
Aliases
-
Associated Syndromes
-
Chromosome Band
13q12.12
Associated Disorders
-
Relevance to Autism

TADA-de novo analysis of published de novo variants in nuclear-encoded mitochondrial-related genes (NEMGs) observed in 31,058 probands with undiagnosed developmental disorder (UDD), 10,318 ASD probands, and 4,262 controls in Luo et al., 2023 identified SACS as an ASD candidate gene with a false discovery rate less than 0.01 (FDR < 0.01); among the published ASD-associated variants in this gene that were used in the TADA analysis were a de novo loss-of-function variant and four de novo damaging missense variants (Yuen et al., 2017; Takata et al., 2018; Feliciano et al., 2019; Satterstrom et al., 2020). Additional de novo coding variants in SACS have been identified in ASD probands (Iossifov et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2022).

Molecular Function

This gene encodes the sacsin protein, which includes a UbL domain at the N-terminus, a DnaJ domain, and a HEPN domain at the C-terminus. The gene is highly expressed in the central nervous system, also found in skin, skeletal muscles and at low levels in the pancreas. This gene includes a very large exon spanning more than 12.8 kb. Mutations in this gene result in autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS), a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by early-onset cerebellar ataxia with spasticity and peripheral neuropathy.

SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to SACS (7 Reports)
# Type Title Author, Year Autism Report Associated Disorders
1 Support The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder Iossifov I et al. (2014) Yes -
2 Support Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder C Yuen RK et al. (2017) Yes -
3 Support Integrative Analyses of De Novo Mutations Provide Deeper Biological Insights into Autism Spectrum Disorder Takata A , et al. (2018) Yes -
4 Support Exome sequencing of 457 autism families recruited online provides evidence for autism risk genes Feliciano P et al. (2019) Yes -
5 Support Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) Yes -
6 Support - Zhou X et al. (2022) Yes -
7 Primary - T Luo et al. (2024) Yes -
Rare Variants   (10)
Status Allele Change Residue Change Variant Type Inheritance Pattern Parental Transmission Family Type PubMed ID Author, Year
c.1109G>A p.Cys370Tyr missense_variant De novo - - 35982159 Zhou X et al. (2022)
c.8073A>G p.Lys2691= synonymous_variant De novo - - 35982159 Zhou X et al. (2022)
c.11968T>C p.Cys3990Arg missense_variant De novo - - 35982159 Zhou X et al. (2022)
c.3745C>T p.Gln1249Ter stop_gained De novo - - 31981491 Satterstrom FK et al. (2020)
c.3045G>T p.Trp1015Cys missense_variant De novo - - 31452935 Feliciano P et al. (2019)
c.8575C>T p.His2859Tyr missense_variant De novo - - 31452935 Feliciano P et al. (2019)
c.12437C>T p.Ser4146Leu missense_variant De novo - Simplex 35982159 Zhou X et al. (2022)
c.6158A>G p.Glu2053Gly missense_variant De novo - Simplex 28263302 C Yuen RK et al. (2017)
c.12317T>C p.Leu4106Pro missense_variant De novo - Simplex 29346770 Takata A , et al. (2018)
c.3123G>C p.Gln1041His missense_variant De novo - Simplex 25363768 Iossifov I et al. (2014)
Common Variants  

No common variants reported.

SFARI Gene score
2

Strong Candidate

Score Delta: Score remained at 2

2

Strong Candidate

See all Category 2 Genes

We considered a rigorous statistical comparison between cases and controls, yielding genome-wide statistical significance, with independent replication, to be the strongest possible evidence for a gene. These criteria were relaxed slightly for category 2.

1/1/2024
icon
2

Increased from to 2

Krishnan Probability Score

Score 0.56879266768152

Ranking 1095/25841 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
Krishnan and colleagues generated probability scores genome-wide by using a machine learning approach on a human brain-specific gene network. The method was first presented in Nat Neurosci 19, 1454-1462 (2016), and scores for more than 25,000 RefSeq genes can be accessed in column G of supplementary table 3 (see: http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v19/n11/extref/nn.4353-S5.xlsx). A searchable browser, with the ability to view networks of associated ASD risk genes, can be found at asd.princeton.edu.
ExAC Score

Score 6.1462947887645E-12

Ranking 17218/18225 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
The Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) is a summary database of 60,706 exomes that has been widely used to estimate 'constraint' on mutation for individual genes. It was introduced by Lek et al. Nature 536, 285-291 (2016), and the ExAC browser can be found at exac.broadinstitute.org. The pLI score was developed as measure of intolerance to loss-of- function mutation. A pLI > 0.9 is generally viewed as highly constrained, and thus any loss-of- function mutations in autism in such a gene would be more likely to confer risk. For a full list of pLI scores see: ftp://ftp.broadinstitute.org/pub/ExAC_release/release0.3.1/functional_gene_constraint/fordist_cle aned_exac_nonTCGA_z_pli_rec_null_data.txt
Sanders TADA Score

Score 0.94832381799371

Ranking 17637/18665 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
The TADA score ('Transmission and De novo Association') was introduced by He et al. PLoS Genet 9(8):e1003671 (2013), and is a statistic that integrates evidence from both de novo and transmitted mutations. It forms the basis for the claim of 65 individual genes being strongly associated with autism risk at a false discovery rate of 0.1 (Sanders et al. Neuron 87, 1215-1233 (2015)). The calculated TADA score for 18,665 RefSeq genes can be found in column P of Supplementary Table 6 in the Sanders et al. paper (the column headed 'tadaFdrAscSscExomeSscAgpSmallDel'), which represents a combined analysis of exome data and small de novo deletions (see www.cell.com/cms/attachment/2038545319/2052606711/mmc7.xlsx).
Zhang D Score

Score 0.45307250017566

Ranking 892/20870 scored genes


[Show Scoring Methodology]
The DAMAGES score (disease-associated mutation analysis using gene expression signatures), or D score, was developed to combine evidence from de novo loss-of- function mutation with evidence from cell-type- specific gene expression in the mouse brain (specifically translational profiles of 24 specific mouse CNS cell types isolated from 6 different brain regions). Genes with positive D scores are more likely to be associated with autism risk, with higher-confidence genes having higher D scores. This statistic was first presented by Zhang & Shen (Hum Mutat 38, 204- 215 (2017), and D scores for more than 20,000 RefSeq genes can be found in column M in supplementary table 2 from that paper.
Submit New Gene

Report an Error