TLN2talin 2
Autism Reports / Total Reports
7 / 9Rare Variants / Common Variants
13 / 0Aliases
-Associated Syndromes
-Chromosome Band
15q22.2Associated Disorders
-Relevance to Autism
A de novo missense variant with a CADD score > 25 was identified in the TLN2 gene in a Korean ASD proband in Kim et al., 2024; this gene was subsequently classified as an ASD candidate gene in males following a combined TADA analysis consisting of the Korean ASD cohort described in Kim et al., 2024 in addition to the Simons Simplex Collection and the SPARK cohort. A number of de novo variants in the TLN2 gene, including a de novo loss-of-function variant and eight de novo missense variants (four of which were predicted to be deleterious by CADD or REVEL), were previously reported in ASD probands from the Autism Sequencing Consortium, the Simons Simplex Collection, the MSSNG cohort, the SPARK cohort, and a Chinese ASD cohort (De Rubeis et al., 2014; Iossifov et al., 2014; Yuen et al., 2017; Satterstrom et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2022; Yuan et al., 2023).
Molecular Function
This gene encodes a protein related to talin 1, a cytoskeletal protein that plays a significant role in the assembly of actin filaments and in spreading and migration of various cell types, including fibroblasts and osteoclasts. This protein has a different pattern of expression compared to talin 1 but, like talin 1, is thought to associate with unique transmembrane receptors to form novel linkages between extracellular matrices and the actin cytoskeleton. Di Paolo et al., 2002 reported that Tln2 was the predominant talin that interacted with PIP5K1C in rat brain, and this interaction induced clustering of PIP5K1C and talin at focal adhesions and increased the local production of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate; Morgan et al., 2004 subsequently reported that microinjection of reagents into large lamprey axons that competed with the talin-PIP kinase interaction resulted in a dramatic decrease of synaptic actin and an impairment of clathrin-mediated synaptic vesicle endocytosis.
External Links
SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to TLN2 (9 Reports)
# | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Support | - | Gilbert Di Paolo et al. (2002) | No | - |
2 | Support | - | Jennifer R Morgan et al. (2004) | No | - |
3 | Support | Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
4 | Support | The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder | Iossifov I et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
5 | Support | Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder | C Yuen RK et al. (2017) | Yes | - |
6 | Support | Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | Yes | - |
7 | Support | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
8 | Support | - | Yuan B et al. (2023) | Yes | - |
9 | Primary | - | Soo-Whee Kim et al. (2024) | Yes | - |
Rare Variants (13)
Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
c.2954A>T | p.Gln985Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2299C>G | p.Leu767Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 36881370 | Yuan B et al. (2023) | |
c.3310A>G | p.Met1104Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1279G>T | p.Val427Phe | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 39334436 | Soo-Whee Kim et al. (2024) | |
c.2805C>T | p.Ile935= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | - | 39334436 | Soo-Whee Kim et al. (2024) | |
c.6144G>A | p.Ala2048= | synonymous_variant | De novo | - | - | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | |
c.2243G>A | p.Arg748His | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.2746del | p.Ile916LeufsTer57 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.5014C>T | p.Arg1672Trp | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.6838G>A | p.Ala2280Thr | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 31981491 | Satterstrom FK et al. (2020) | |
c.7418G>T | p.Arg2473Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 28263302 | C Yuen RK et al. (2017) | |
c.7232C>T | p.Ala2411Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | Multiplex | 28263302 | C Yuen RK et al. (2017) | |
c.601_606del | p.Tyr201_Ser202del | inframe_deletion | De novo | - | Simplex | 25363768 | Iossifov I et al. (2014) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
Suggestive Evidence


criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaThe literature is replete with relatively small studies of candidate genes, using either common or rare variant approaches, which do not reach the criteria set out for categories 1 and 2. Genes that had two such lines of supporting evidence were placed in category 3, and those with one line of evidence were placed in category 4. Some additional lines of "accessory evidence" (indicated as "acc" in the score cards) could also boost a gene from category 4 to 3.
10/1/2024
Initial score established: 3
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.56514513366239
Ranking 1254/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 0.9998532307737
Ranking 737/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 0.95035174805138
Ranking 18458/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Zhang D Score
Score 0.28842164639639
Ranking 2909/20870 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]