TNPO3transportin 3
Autism Reports / Total Reports
7 / 9Rare Variants / Common Variants
11 / 0Chromosome Band
7q32.1Associated Disorders
-Genetic Category
Rare Single Gene MutationRelevance to Autism
TNPO3 was identified as an ASD candidate gene based on having a p-value < 0.001 following DeNovoWEST analysis of de novo variants in 16,877 ASD trios from the Simons Simplex Collection, the Autism Sequencing Consortium, the MSSNG cohort, and the SPARK cohort in Zhou et al., 2022; among the de novo variants observed in ASD cases in this analysis were four damaging de novo missense variants (defined as having a REVEL score > 0.5). Whole-exome sequencing on 67 families with ASD and abnormal head circumference from the Autism Clinical and Genetic Resources in China (ACGC) cohort in Wu et al., 2020 had previously identified a de novo missense variant in TNPO3 in an ASD proband who also presented with macrocephaly; furthermore, the authors observed an excess of TNPO3 de novo variants in 10,842 previously published cases with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) deposited in denovo-db (P = 5.9E-08, Padj = 0.001, CH model; P = 1.3E-06, Padj = 0.026, denovolyzeR model; Bonferroni correction).
Molecular Function
The protein encoded by this gene is a nuclear import receptor for serine/arginine-rich (SR) proteins such as the splicing factors SFRS1 and SFRS2. Mutations in TNPO3 are responsible for autosomal dominant limb-girdle muscular dystrophy-2 (LGMDD2; OMIM 608423), an autosomal dominant myopathy characterized by proximal muscle weakness primarily affecting the lower limbs, but also affecting the upper limbs in most patients (Melia et al., 2013; Torella et al., 2013).
External Links
SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to TNPO3 (9 Reports)
# | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Support | - | MeliÃÂ MJ et al. (2013) | No | - |
2 | Support | - | Torella A et al. (2013) | No | - |
3 | Support | Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
4 | Support | The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder | Iossifov I et al. (2014) | Yes | - |
5 | Support | Phenotype-to-genotype approach reveals head-circumference-associated genes in an autism spectrum disorder cohort | Wu H , et al. (2019) | Yes | - |
6 | Primary | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
7 | Support | - | Wang J et al. (2023) | Yes | - |
8 | Support | - | Cirnigliaro M et al. (2023) | Yes | - |
9 | Support | - | Soo-Whee Kim et al. (2024) | Yes | - |
Rare Variants (11)
Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
c.873-2A>G | - | splice_site_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.232C>G | p.Leu78Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.250G>T | p.Ala84Ser | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1037G>T | p.Trp346Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1043G>T | p.Arg348Leu | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.2015G>C | p.Cys672Ser | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 31674007 | Wu H , et al. (2019) | |
c.2540C>G | p.Pro847Arg | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 25363760 | De Rubeis S , et al. (2014) | |
c.1673C>T | p.Ala558Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 37393044 | Wang J et al. (2023) | |
c.1840C>T | p.Arg614Cys | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 25363768 | Iossifov I et al. (2014) | |
c.2542del | p.Tyr848IlefsTer25 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 39334436 | Soo-Whee Kim et al. (2024) | |
c.2644del | p.Tyr882IlefsTer25 | frameshift_variant | Familial | Maternal | Multiplex | 37506195 | Cirnigliaro M et al. (2023) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
Suggestive Evidence


Score Delta: Score remained at 3
criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaThe literature is replete with relatively small studies of candidate genes, using either common or rare variant approaches, which do not reach the criteria set out for categories 1 and 2. Genes that had two such lines of supporting evidence were placed in category 3, and those with one line of evidence were placed in category 4. Some additional lines of "accessory evidence" (indicated as "acc" in the score cards) could also boost a gene from category 4 to 3.
10/1/2022

Increased from to 3
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.44814128240432
Ranking 11740/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 0.0013892014781307
Ranking 11550/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 0.19253061812935
Ranking 107/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Zhang D Score
Score 0.36335622106318
Ranking 1862/20870 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]