YY1YY1transcription factor
Autism Reports / Total Reports
3 / 9Rare Variants / Common Variants
29 / 0Aliases
YY1, DELTA, INO80S, NF-E1, UCRBP, YIN-YANG-1Associated Syndromes
Gabriele-de Vries syndrome, DD, IDChromosome Band
14q32.2Associated Disorders
ASDRelevance to Autism
Phenotypic information from 23 individuals with de novo mutations or deletions of the YY1 gene was used to identify an intellectual disability syndrome characterized by behavioral abnormalities, intrauterine growth retardation, feeding problems, recurrent dysmorphic features, and various congenital malformations; two of the ten individuals with de novo YY1 mutations presented with autism or ASD (Gabriele et al., 2017). YY1 had previously been shown to interact with MECP2 (Forlani et al., 2010) and HCFC1 (Huang et al., 2012).
Molecular Function
YY1 is a ubiquitously distributed transcription factor belonging to the GLI-Kruppel class of zinc finger proteins. The protein is involved in repressing and activating a diverse number of promoters. YY1 may direct histone deacetylases and histone acetyltransferases to a promoter in order to activate or repress the promoter, thus implicating histone modification in the function of YY1.
External Links
SFARI Genomic Platforms
Reports related to YY1 (9 Reports)
# | Type | Title | Author, Year | Autism Report | Associated Disorders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Support | The MeCP2/YY1 interaction regulates ANT1 expression at 4q35: novel hints for Rett syndrome pathogenesis | Forlani G , et al. (2010) | No | - |
2 | Support | A noncoding, regulatory mutation implicates HCFC1 in nonsyndromic intellectual disability | Huang L , et al. (2012) | No | - |
3 | Primary | YY1 Haploinsufficiency Causes an Intellectual Disability Syndrome Featuring Transcriptional and Chromatin Dysfunction | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | No | ASD |
4 | Support | Both rare and common genetic variants contribute to autism in the Faroe Islands | Leblond CS , et al. (2019) | Yes | - |
5 | Support | Identification of De Novo JAK2 and MAPK7 Mutations Related to Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Whole-Exome Sequencing in a Chinese Child and Adolescent Trio-Based Sample | Jiao J , et al. (2019) | Yes | - |
6 | Support | - | Cherik F et al. (2022) | No | ASD, ADHD, stereotypy |
7 | Support | - | Zhou X et al. (2022) | Yes | - |
8 | Support | - | Chaves LD et al. (2023) | No | - |
9 | Support | - | Spataro N et al. (2023) | No | - |
Rare Variants (29)
Status | Allele Change | Residue Change | Variant Type | Inheritance Pattern | Parental Transmission | Family Type | PubMed ID | Author, Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
- | - | copy_number_loss | De novo | - | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
- | - | copy_number_loss | De novo | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
- | - | copy_number_loss | Unknown | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
- | p.His320Arg | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
- | p.Val374Gly | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
c.1062+1G>A | - | splice_site_variant | De novo | - | - | 36943625 | Chaves LD et al. (2023) | |
c.535A>T | p.Lys179Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
c.1135G>A | p.Gly379Arg | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35982159 | Zhou X et al. (2022) | |
c.1030C>T | p.Gln344Ter | stop_gained | De novo | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
c.527G>A | p.Gly176Asp | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
c.908G>T | p.Cys303Phe | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
c.1001T>C | p.Phe334Ser | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
c.1007A>G | p.Glu336Gly | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
c.1112G>A | p.Arg371His | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
c.1124G>A | p.Arg375Gln | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
c.1036G>T | p.Val346Phe | missense_variant | Unknown | - | - | 36980980 | Spataro N et al. (2023) | |
c.958C>T | p.His320Tyr | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
c.1015A>C | p.Lys339Gln | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
c.1096C>G | p.Leu366Val | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
c.1097T>C | p.Leu366Pro | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
c.1138G>T | p.Asp380Tyr | missense_variant | De novo | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
c.961G>A | p.Gly321Ser | missense_variant | De novo | - | Simplex | 31838722 | Jiao J , et al. (2019) | |
c.690dup | p.Asp231ArgfsTer3 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
c.1177_1179del | p.Lys393del | inframe_deletion | De novo | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
c.1067C>T | p.Thr356Met | missense_variant | Familial | Paternal | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
c.385del | p.Asp129IlefsTer127 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
c.1173del | p.Asn391LysfsTer10 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 28575647 | Gabriele M , et al. (2017) | |
c.1151_1154dup | p.Pro386ValfsTer7 | frameshift_variant | De novo | - | - | 35027293 | Cherik F et al. (2022) | |
c.679_679+1insATGAAAAAAAAGATATTGACCATGAGACA | p.Val237MetfsTer29 | frameshift_variant | Familial | Maternal | Simplex | 30675382 | Leblond CS , et al. (2019) |
Common Variants
No common variants reported.
SFARI Gene score
High Confidence, Syndromic


Score Delta: Score remained at 1S
criteria met
See SFARI Gene'scoring criteriaWe considered a rigorous statistical comparison between cases and controls, yielding genome-wide statistical significance, with independent replication, to be the strongest possible evidence for a gene. These criteria were relaxed slightly for category 2.
The syndromic category includes mutations that are associated with a substantial degree of increased risk and consistently linked to additional characteristics not required for an ASD diagnosis. If there is independent evidence implicating a gene in idiopathic ASD, it will be listed as "#S" (e.g., 2S, 3S, etc.). If there is no such independent evidence, the gene will be listed simply as "S."
1/1/2020

Score remained at 1
Description
Phenotypic information from 23 individuals with de novo mutations or deletions of the YY1 gene was used to identify an intellectual disability syndrome characterized by behavioral abnormalities, intrauterine growth retardation, feeding problems, recurrent dysmorphic features, and various congenital malformations; two of the ten individuals with de novo YY1 mutations presented with autism or ASD (Gabriele et al., 2017). YY1 had previously been shown to interact with MECP2 (Forlani et al., 2010) and HCFC1 (Huang et al., 2012).
10/1/2019

Increased from S to 1
New Scoring Scheme
Description
Phenotypic information from 23 individuals with de novo mutations or deletions of the YY1 gene was used to identify an intellectual disability syndrome characterized by behavioral abnormalities, intrauterine growth retardation, feeding problems, recurrent dysmorphic features, and various congenital malformations; two of the ten individuals with de novo YY1 mutations presented with autism or ASD (Gabriele et al., 2017). YY1 had previously been shown to interact with MECP2 (Forlani et al., 2010) and HCFC1 (Huang et al., 2012).
Reports Added
[New Scoring Scheme]1/1/2019

Increased from S to S
Description
Phenotypic information from 23 individuals with de novo mutations or deletions of the YY1 gene was used to identify an intellectual disability syndrome characterized by behavioral abnormalities, intrauterine growth retardation, feeding problems, recurrent dysmorphic features, and various congenital malformations; two of the ten individuals with de novo YY1 mutations presented with autism or ASD (Gabriele et al., 2017). YY1 had previously been shown to interact with MECP2 (Forlani et al., 2010) and HCFC1 (Huang et al., 2012).
Krishnan Probability Score
Score 0.51758832611444
Ranking 1729/25841 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
ExAC Score
Score 0.96783095492667
Ranking 2404/18225 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Sanders TADA Score
Score 0.93349470412787
Ranking 12286/18665 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]
Zhang D Score
Score 0.32825282522028
Ranking 2310/20870 scored genes
[Show Scoring Methodology]